Disposed

G.Nagarajan v. The Revenue Divisional

Madras HC9 Aug 2016WP/27794/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by G.Nagarajan for the issuance of community certificates to his children. The court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to consider the application, verify existing community certificates held by the petitioner, and pass necessary orders within two months.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondent to verify the petitioner's existing community certificates and issue a community certificate to his children or pass necessary orders within two months.

G.Nagarajan Vs The Revenue Divisional — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 09.08.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G. RAMESH

¶5

and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN

¶7

Writ Petition No.27794 of 2016

¶8

G.Nagarajan ...Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Harur, Dharmapuri District. ...Respondent

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue community certificate to the children of the petitioner viz., (i)N.Shivasurya Kumar and (ii)N.Rajasree that they belong to Kurumans (ST) community based upon the community certificate already issued to the petitioner and his wife M.Sathyapriya and his close blood relative Govindaraj, which was verified by the State Level Scrutiny Committee in his proceedings No.21289/CVIII/2008 dated 10.06.2014.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Elangovan For Respondent : Ms.M.Lalitha, GA

¶13

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by HULUVADI G. RAMESH,J.)

¶14

Ms.M.Lalitha, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶15

This Writ Petition is filed to direct the respondent to issue community certificate to the children of the petitioner viz., (i) N.Shivasurya Kumar and (ii)N.Rajasree that they belong to Kurumans (ST) community based upon the community certificate already issued to the petitioner and his wife M.Sathyapriya and his close blood relative Govindaraj, which was verified by the State Level Scrutiny Committee in his proceedings No.21289/CVIII/2008 dated 10.06.2014.

¶16

According to the petitioner, he is working as a Senior Section Engineer in Integral Coach Factory, Chennai and his wife M.Sathyapriya is working as a Pharmacist in Primary Health Centre,

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Pennagaram and they belong to Kurumans community, which is notified as Scheduled Tribe Community. They have obtained community certificate to that effect from the respondent. In their service registers also, their community was mentioned as Kurumans Scheduled Tribe Community. On 14.08.2015, the petitioner applied for issuance of community certificate to his children viz., (i)N.Shivasurya Kumar and (ii)N.Rajasree to the respondent. However, till date, neither any enquiry was conducted nor any order was passed either granting the community certificate or rejecting the application. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court with the present writ petition.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we direct the respondent to consider the application dated 14.08.2015 preferred by the petitioner and verify the aspects as regards the Community Certificates already issued to the petitioner and his wife M.Sathyapriya and his close blood relative Govindaraj, which is stated to be verified by State Level Scrutiny Committee by its proceedings No.21289/CVIII/2008 dated 10.06.2014 and pass necessary orders regarding issuance of community certificate, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Sd/Asst.Registrar /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar To The Revenue Divisional Officer Harur, Dharmapuri District.

¶22

+1 cc to M/s.S.doraisamy, advocate,sr.45410 mpi(co) krd 18/8

¶23

W.P.No.27794 of 2016

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Nagarajan v. The Revenue Divisional

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Nagarajan v. The Revenue Divisional

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Narasimhan, Hereditary Vs The District Collector

L.v.K.Properties Private Ltd., Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

Chinna Mari, Vs The District Collector

K.Sankaran Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

P.K.Shefi Vs the Senior Divisional

The Government of Tamil Nadu, Vs T.Kaliarajan