Dismissed

Ttk Protective Devices Limited v. Government of Puducherry

Madras HC6 Jan 2016WP/251/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition filed under Article 226, the petitioner challenged an order referring an industrial dispute to the Industrial Tribunal. The Court held that the challenge pertained to the merits of the industrial dispute and not to jurisdiction or legality, thus dismissing the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition and Writ Miscellaneous Petition were dismissed with no costs awarded.

Ttk Protective Devices Limited Vs Government of… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

¶2

Dated : 06.1.2016

¶3

Coram :

¶4

The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

Writ Petition No.251 of 2016 and WMP.No.145 of 2016

¶6

TTK Protective Devices Ltd.,
Puducherry ...Petitioner
Vs
1. Government of Puducherry, rep.by
its under Secretary to Government-
Labour, Puducherry.
2. The Presiding Officer, Industrial
Tribunal, Puducherry.
3. United Labour Federation, No.149,
Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai-1
rep.by its Secretary
4. Packwell Packaging Products Ltd.,
Puducherry. ...Respondents

¶7

PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records connected with G.O.Rt. No.116/AIL/LAB/J/2014 dated 13.8.2014 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.Ravi for M/s.Gupta & Ravi For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mrs.N.Mala, AGP

¶9

ORDER

¶10

Mrs.N.Mala, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for respondents 1 and 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶11

The petitioner challenges the impugned order dated 13.8.2014, in and by which, the first respondent referred the dispute arose between the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Puducherry.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

Pursuant to the impugned order of reference, notice has been issued by the Industrial Tribunal on 19.9.2014 and it is stated that the matter has been posted today i.e 06.1.2016. On the grounds raised by the petitioner, the impugned order cannot be quashed, as the contentions are on the merits of the claim made by the workmen or the defence, which is likely to be raised by the petitioner management. Hence, it would be proper for the petitioner management to raise all the contentions before the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Puducherry in the pending industrial dispute.

¶14

With the above observation, the writ petition is
dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the above WMP is also
dismissed.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Under Secretary to Government of Puducherry, Labour,
Puducherry.
2.The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Puducherry.
+ 1 cc to M/s.Gupta and Ravi, Advocate SR 690
+ 1 cc to Govt.Pleader (Puducherry) SR 944
vgi(co)
prk22/1 WP.No.251 of 2016&
WMP.No.145 of 2016

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ttk Protective Devices Limited v. Government of Puducherry

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ttk Protective Devices Limited v. Government of Puducherry

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Ramajayam Educational Vs Rajesh Lakhoni IAS

M/s.Kandagiri Spinning Mills Vs Recovery Officer

B.Ravikumar, Vs The Assistant Engineer

A.Rajendran, Vs The Registrar of Cooperative

R.Eswaran Vs The Deputy Registrar

G.Raja Vs Registrar of Co-operative