Iyyamperumal v. the Principal Commr.& Commr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners withdrew the Writ Petition filed challenging land ceiling proceedings. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
No costs.
Petitioners withdrew the Writ Petition filed challenging land ceiling proceedings. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 20.04.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.24641 of 2003
1.Ayyamperumal 2.Thirunavukkarasu .. Petitioners Versus 1.The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax and Competent Authority of Urban Land Ceiling, Alandur Area, No.169, Sannadhi Street, Adambakkam, Chennai-600 088. 3.The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk at Tambaram, Chennai-600 045. .. Respondents
Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the connected records of the second respondent issued in his Proceedings S.R.No.227/85, dated 31.01.1991 under Section 9(5) of the Principal Act declaring the petitioner's land in Survey Nos.206/1 and 2 of Nanmangalam Village, measuring to an extent of 5000 sq.mts as excess vacant land and the notice issued by the second respondent in Form VII, dated 28.07.2000 (certified copy issued on 09.08.2000) under Section 11(5) of the said Act requiring to surrender possession of the said land with the Tahsildar, Tambram, within one month from July 1997 and the Proceedings of the first respondent in his Endt.R.C.No.2898/2001-J1, dated 16.04.2003 and quash the same so far as the petitioners are concerned and direct the second respondent to declare that all Proceedings taken by the second respondent to acquire the lands as excess vacant land shall abate under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 20 of 1999.
For Petitioners : Mr.P.C.Manoharan For Respondents : Mr.R.Rajeswaran Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to the said effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar r p a To 1.The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax and Competent Authority of Urban Land Ceiling, Alandur Area, No.169, Sannadhi Street, Adambakkam, Chennai-600 088. 3.The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk at Tambaram, Chennai-600 045.
1 cc to Mr.S.Thambuswamy, Advocate, sr.24253
W.P.No.24641 of 2003 vd co kra 06.05.2016
Ayyamperumal
Thirunavukkarasu
Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Reforms
Assistant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax and Competent Authority of Urban Land Ceiling
Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk
T.S.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court