Allowed

Raja Kulasekaran, v. Corporation of Chennai

Madras HC17 Feb 2016WP/2436/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the High Court directed the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority to process the petitioners' application for demolition and reconstruction approval without insisting on patta production, relying on an orientation sketch from the Tamil Nadu Housing Board, within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

URGED THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONERS' APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMISSION AND ISSUANCE OF APPROVAL FOR DEMOLITION WITHIN EIGHT WEEKS WITHOUT INSISTING UPON PRODUCTION OF PATTA.

Raja Kulasekaran, Vs Corporation of Chennai — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 17-02-2016

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM

¶6

W.P.No.2436 of 2016

¶7

Raja Kulasekaran 2. K. Sundara Babu

¶8

.. Petitioners

¶9

¶10

Corporation of Chennai Rep. by its Commissioner Rippon Buildings Chennai - 3

¶11

Corporation of Chennai Rep by its Executive Engineer Zonal Office Thiruvanmiyur Chennai - 41

¶12

Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Rep. by its Member Secretary No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore, Chennai - 8

¶13

Thasildhar Revenue Department Velacherry Chennai .. Respondents

¶14

¶15

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider and pass orders on the application vide file No.B2/6509/2015 dated 24.12.2015 for issuance of approval for demolition and reconstruction and planning persuances for construction for the premises at E113 16th Cross Street Besant Nagar Chennai-90 expeditiously in accordance with law more particularly without insisting on production of patta from the 4th respondent.

¶16

: For petitioners Mr. D.S. Rajasekaran For respondents : Mr. P.V. Selvakumar

¶17

for RR1 & 2

¶18

Mr.M.Karthikeyan for R3 Mr. R. Rajeswaran,Spl.G.P for R4

¶19

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The petitioners have filed this writ petition praying for a writ of

¶22

mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioners' application, dated 24-12-2015 without insisting upon production of patta for the land.

¶23

The petitioners have come forward with such a relief since the

¶24

property was initially a property, which was developed by Tamil Nadu Housing Board and a orientation sketch, issued by Tamil Nadu Housing

¶25

Board has been produced, which is equivalent or akin to patta. The

¶26

¶27

building is in a dilapidated condition and it would take a long time for the petitioners to get patta. Therefore, the petitioners seek a direction the respondents to process their application based on the orientation sketch issued by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board.

¶28

The learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to the orders passed by this Court in similar issue in W.P.Nos.175 and 336 of 2011 dated 07-01-2011, W.P.No.8272 of 2009 dated 29-04-2009, W.P.No.9905 of 2008 dated 23-04-2008 and W.P.No.11295 of 2006 dated 21-04-2006, and

¶29

would submit that the direction issued in all these matters has been complied with.

¶30

In the light of the above, there will be a direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioners' application for permission without insisting upon patta in terms of the similar direction in the aforementioned

¶31

orders provided that the petitioners' application for planning permission is otherwise is in order. The above direction shall be complied with within a period of eight weeks.

¶32

The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. No costs.

17-02-2016

glp

T. S. SIVAGNANAM,J.

glp

Corporation of Chennai Rep. by its Commissioner Rippon Buildings Chennai - 3

¶40

Corporation of Chennai Rep by its Executive Engineer Zonal Office Thiruvanmiyur Chennai - 41

¶41

Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Rep. by its Member Secretary No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore, Chennai - 8

¶42

Thasildhar Revenue Department Velacherry Chennai

¶43

W.P.No.2436 of 2016

¶44

17-02-2016

Raja Kulasekaran, v. Corporation of Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raja Kulasekaran, v. Corporation of Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Kannan Vs The District Collector

K.Mathaiyan @ Nehru Vs the Registrar

R.Sridharan Vs Jayakumar

R. Govindan Vs v.Nataraja Reddiar (Died)

Mrs.Radhika Kannan, Vs The Secretary to Government

M.Muthu Vs The Commissioner