S.Nalini v. The Regional Transport
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought withdrawal of W.P.No.2269 of 2016. Upon permission being granted, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.04.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.2269 of 2016
S.Nalini .. Petitioner
v.
1.The Regional Transport Authority
Tirupur region – South
Collector's office
Tiruppur
2.The Regional Transport Officer-cum-Secretary
Regional Transport Authority(N)
Tiruppur – 641 603.
.. Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the
respondents herein to forthwith release the Minibus TN 59 N 0750
of the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Padmanabhan
For Respondent : Mr.M.S.Ramesh
Addl. Govt. Pleader
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the memorandum
of grounds in the writ petition. In view of the same, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
Rj
To
1.The Regional Transport Authority
Tirupur region – South
Collector's office
Tiruppur
2.The Regional Transport Officer-cum-Secretary
Regional Transport Authority(N)
Tiruppur – 641 603.
+1 cc to Government Pleader sr.24167
+1 cc to Mr.T.Padmanabhan Advocate sr.23998
W.P.No.2269 of 2016
aa27/04/2016
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Nalini
- respondent
The Regional Transport Authority, Tirupur region – South
- respondent
The Regional Transport Officer-cum-Secretary, Regional Transport Authority(N) Tiruppur
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court