The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a penalty and conversion of excess demand charges into instalments. The petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the petition at the Bar stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.06.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN
S.Sadhasivam ...Petitioner
Vs.
The Junior Electricity Engineer O&M, Pudanchandai, Palapatty Distribution, Namakkal Taluk & District. ...Respondents
PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records comprised in K.No.A.E.E/O&M/Pudhanchandai/Ko.LTCT/No.124/2013 dated 02.08.2013, in so far as imposing penalty of Rs.9,01,243.40 on the file of the respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to receive the excess demand charges to the tune of Rs.9,01,243.40 in 36 equal monthly instalments.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.S.K.Rameshuwar
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
The Junior Electricity Engineer O&M, Pudanchandai, Palapatty Distribution, Namakkal Taluk & District.
+1 cc to M/s.R.Karthikeyan Advocate sr.33579
W.P. No.22122 of 2013
mp(co)
aa12/07/2016
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Sadhasivam
The Junior Electricity Engineer O&M, Pudanchandai, Palapatty Distribution, Namakkal Taluk & District
N.KIRUBAKARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
