S.Ramadoss, v. the State of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition seeking promotion to the post of Forest Ranger for non-prosecution by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.12.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.No.2196 of 2011
S.Ramadoss ... Petitioner
vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by Principal Secretary to Government, Environment & Forests Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.
2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Chennai – 600 015.
3.The District Forest Officer,
Salem. ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the name of the petitioner for inclusion in the panel for the promotion to the post of Forest Ranger for the year 2010-11 for which the crucial date being 15.8.2009.
For petitioner : No appearance For respondents : Mr.M.Santhana Raman, Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
When the matter was posted on 20.12.2016, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition was directed to be posted “for dismissal” today. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(J)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
asvm
To
1.The Principal Secretary to Government,
The State of Tamil Nadu,
Environment & Forests Department,
Secretariat, Chennai – 9.
2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,
Chennai – 600 015.
3.The District Forest Officer,
Salem.
W.P.No.2196 of 2011
pvs[co]
srg 23/01/2017
S. Ramadoss
State of Tamil Nadu
D. Krushnakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court