5.The claim for compensation in respect of Survey No.769/1 was considered by the second respondent and by an order dated 22.07.2014, the second respondent took note of the direction issued by this Court in the earlier Writ Petition in W.P.No.28748 of 2010 and pointed out that by proceedings of the first respondent dated 25.02.2013, the second respondent was directed to take appropriate action for payment of compensation, after verifying all the revenue records. Further, it has been stated in the said order that the petitioners' Power Agent Thiru Unnikumaran was called upon to produce the Linkage Document upto Thiru Angusamy @ Angureddy, who was original pattadar of the land in Survey No.769/1, as per the Revenue Records to prove their claim and the Power Agent of the petitioners has not produced any documentary evidence in support of the said claim. The District Collector has conducted enquiry and also recorded the statement of the power agent of the petitioners. After perusal of all the records and hearing the parties, the District Collector concluded that the petitioners' Power Agent is unable to produce linkage documents to prove his claim to the property in question and on production of the linkage documents, his request would be considered.
