Petitioner withdrew the writ petition seeking a stay on TASMAC license grant on the grounds that his signature was forged while intoxicated.
The Writ Petition was dismissed and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.03.2016
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.1981 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
M.Nagamuthu S/o Manickam ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (TASMAC) rep by its Managing Director, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, Gandhi Irvin Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.
2.The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (TASMAC), No.735, LLA Building, 4th Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.
3.The District Manager (TASMAC), Thiruvallur East & Thiruvallur District, Unit – 1, Thirumazhisai, No.1, Bangalore N.H.Road, Chemberambakkam, Pin – 602 103.
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from granting license to install TASMAC Wine shop in Alapakkam Main Road, Madhuravoyal which lies adjacent to the main road which runs from Madhuravoyal Earikari to Porur violating the rules contemplated under Tamil Nadu Liquor Retain Vending (In Shops and Bars) Rules 2003.
Petitioner : Mr.M.Nagamuthu, party-in-person (as per revocation of vakalat ordered dated 04.03.2016)
For Respondents : no appearance
O R D E R
The petitioner viz., M.Nagamuthu S/o Manickam appeared in person and submitted that he has not instructed Mr.S.Balasubramanian, Advocate to file the Writ Petition and that his signatures were obtained by some unidentified persons when he was in an intoxicated mood. Further, the petitioner has stated that he wants to withdraw the Writ Petition and that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn and to that effect, the petitioner has also made an endorsement in the Writ Petition. The petitioner submitted that he can only read Tamil and that he cannot write in Tamil. Therefore, the endorsement in the Writ Petition has been made by the Court Officer, which was read by the petitioner and signed by him.
2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous
petition is closed.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS VII )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
va
To
1.The Managing Director
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited
(TASMAC)
Thalamuthu Natarajan Building,
Gandhi Irvin Road,
Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.
2.The Senior Regional Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited
(TASMAC), No.735, LLA Building,
3.The District Manager (TASMAC), Thiruvallur East & Thiruvallur District, Unit – 1, Thirumazhisai, No.1, Bangalore N.H.Road, Chemberambakkam, Pin – 602 103.
W.P.No.1981 of 2015 and W.M.P.No.515 of 2016
RSI (CO) kk 24/3
M.Nagamuthu S/o Manickam
Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (TASMAC)
M.Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
