Dismissed

Workmen of Avtec Ltd., Housr, v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC27 Jun 2016WP/18776/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition challenging the Commencement of Lay-off was admitted for purpose of withdrawal by the petitioner, who sought leave to dismiss the petition as infructuous. The High Court granted leave and dismissed the petition accordingly, closing the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous upon leave granted for its withdrawal.

Workmen of Avtec Ltd., Housr, Vs The Government of… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 27.06.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN

¶5

W.P.No.18776 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.16387 of 2016

¶6

Workmen of AVTEC Ltd., Hosur, Through AVTEC Employees Progressive Federation represented by its General Secretary, Mr.D.D.Raju, AVTEC Ltd., Poonapalli Village, Mathagondapalli Post, Hosur – 635 114. ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Secretary to Government, Department of Labour and Employment, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Management of AVTEC Ltd., Poonapalli Village, Mathagondapalli Post, Hosur – 635 114. 3.The Joint Commissioner of Labour, DMS Compound, Thenampet, Chennai – 600 006. ... Respondents

¶7

Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to decide the application dated 07.04.2016 filed by the 2^nd respondent within such time as stipulated by this Court, on merits and in accordance with Section 25-M of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947, with further direction to the 2^nd respondent not to commence any Lay-off during the pendency of its application for permission for lay-off.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karthikeyan

¶9

For Respondents: Mrs.P.Kavitha, Government Advocate.

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition as it has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶13

In view of the representation and endorsement made by
the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected
Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Department of Labour and Employment,
Secretariat, Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Joint Commissioner of Labour,
DMS Compound,
Thenampet,
Chennai – 600 006.
+1 cc to Govt.Pleader,sr.18776.
rsy(co)
krd 23/7
W.P.No.18776 of 2016

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Workmen of Avtec Ltd., Housr, v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Workmen of Avtec Ltd., Housr, v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Malathi Vs The Commissioner

The Management of Metro Vs Thiru.a.Thanikatchalam

FMR.21, Morappur Fishermen Vs The Block Development

Mrs.G.Devika Lakshmi, Vs The Registrar of Co-operative

P.Kathirvel Vs The Chairman

D.Shanthi Vs The Assistant Engineer