Dismissed

R.Kalaichandran v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC7 Jan 2016WP/17650/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner fishermen community approached this Court seeking legal protection after alleged ex-communication and inability to reside in their homes due to a dispute. The Court disposed of the writ petitions by directing the Joint Commissioner of Police to ensure the petitioners are allowed to enter and reside in their respective houses peacefully.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach 3rd respondent for protection to enter and reside in respective houses peacefully.

R.Kalaichandran Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 07.01.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

¶5

W.P.Nos.17650 to 17654 of 2015

¶6

R.Kalaichandran ... Petitioner in W.P.No.17650 of 2015 C.Madan Kumar ... Petitioner in W.P.No.17651 of 2015 S.Malathi ... Petitioner in W.P.No.17652 of 2015 C.Senthilkumar ... Petitioner in W.P.No.17653 of 2015 T.Anitha ... Petitioner in W.P.No.17654 of 2015 Vs. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by its Secretary to State, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai, 2. The District Collector, District Collectorate, Ma.Singaravelar Maaligai, Rajaji Salai, Chennai, 3. The Joint Commissioner of Police, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai, 4. Mr.Riyazudeen, Inspector of Police (Law & Order), J-6, Thiruvanmiyur Police Station, Chennai – 600 041, 5. Mr.Christin Jayasil, 6. M.S.Veeran 7. B.Palani 8. T.Kumaran 9. S.Chandru 10. G.Kothandan 11. R.Palani 12. T.Kandan 13. B.Srinath 14. N.Gnanamurthy 15. B.Gurunathan 16. R.Vetrivel 17. K.Prabhu 18. A.Mohan ... Respondents in all W.Ps

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

Petitions in W.P.Nos.17650 to 17654 of 2015 are filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1, 2 and 3 to initiate appropriate legal proceedings against the respondents 4 to 18 in view of the petitioner's representation dated 9.6.2015 as per the Judgment of this Court rendered in CDJ 2005 MHC 1139.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Ashok in all W.Ps For Respondents : Mr.S.Pattabiraman,Govt.Advocate 1 to 3 in all W.Ps For Respondents : No Appearance 4 to 18 in all W.Ps COMMON ORDER

¶10

As the issue involved in all these writ petitions is one and the same, they have been taken up together and disposed of by a common order.

¶11

The petitioners belonged to the fishermen community. They have come to this Court with a grievance that on their refusal to comply with the illegal demand of payment of money, they have been ex-communicated by the private respondents. Learned counsel also submitted that the petitioners are unable to live in their own place of residence.

¶12

Counter affidavits have been filed by respondents No.2, 4 and 5. Based upon the said counter affidavits, learned Government Advocate submitted that it is a dispute between two groups. However, the petitioners would be given adequate protection if there is any threat.

¶13

Considering the said submission, this Court is inclined to direct the 3^rd respondent to see that the petitioners are allowed to enter into their respective residences and live there peacefully. Even assuming that there is a dispute between two groups, the same cannot be a ground to drive the persons from their residence.

¶14

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the 3^rd respondent seeking appropriate protection for their entry into their residence. As and when the petitioners approach the 3^rd respondent, the said authority is directed to take all necessary steps to see that

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

the petitioners are allowed to enter and reside in their respective houses. No costs.

¶17

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS II )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
usk
To
1. The Secretary to State,
Home Department,
State of Tamil Nadu,
Fort St.George,
Chennai,
2. The District Collector,
District Collectorate,
Ma.Singaravelar Maaligai,
Rajaji Salai,
Chennai,
3. The Joint Commissioner of Police,
St.Thomas Mount,
Chennai,
W.P.Nos.17650 to 17654
of 2015
VSN (CO)
kk 12/1

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Kalaichandran v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Kalaichandran v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.K.R.S.Girija Shyamsundar Vs M.v.Muralidaharan

M.Yuvaraj Vs The Inspector of Police

Tamilnadu Civil Supplies Vs Gail (India) Ltd.

R.Murugamalai Vs Union of India

Krishnaveni Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

T.Anitha Vs The State of Tamil Nadu