Dismissed

C.Muthupandian @ Muthupandi v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC1 Mar 2016WP/16778/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner applied for withdrawal of a writ petition seeking a public resort licence and a subsequent contempt petition for disobedience of an earlier order. The court allowed the withdrawal upon the counsel's endorsement, dismissing both pleadings.

What did the court decide?

Both the writ petition and the contempt petition were dismissed as withdrawn; connected petitions closed.

C.Muthupandian @ Muthupandi Vs The Secretary to Government — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.03.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH

¶5

W.P.No.16778 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 and Cont.Petn.No.1164 of 2015 and Sub Application No.331 of 2016

¶6

C.Muthupandian @ Muthupandi … Petitioner in both writ and contempt petitions Vs 1.The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil nadu, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Egmore, Chennai-08. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Triplicane Range, Chennai 600 005. 4.The Inspector of Police, D-2, Anna Salai, Chennai. … Respondents in writ petition 1.Mr.Apurva Varma, IAS, The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil nadu, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.Mr.S.George, IPS The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Egmore, Chennai-08.

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

3.Mr.Peer Mohammed

¶9

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Triplicane Range, Chennai 600 005. 4.Mr.Surender

¶10

The Inspector of Police, D-2, Anna Salai, Chennai.

¶11

… Respondents in contempt petition.

¶12

Prayer in writ petition : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of mandamus to direct the 2^nd respondent to issue Public Resort Licence as requested by the petitioner in Application dated 15.12.2014.

¶13

Prayer in contempt petition : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 to punish the second respondent for his wilful and intentional disobedience of the order passed in WP.No.22727 of 2014 under the relevant provision of Contempt of Courts Act 1971.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw both the writ petition and contempt petition, he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶15

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, both the writ petition along with the contempt petition are dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition and sub application are closed. No costs.

¶16

-s/dAssistant Registrar(CSVI)

¶17

tsh

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

¶20

1.The Secretary to Government,
Government of Tamil nadu,
Home Department,
Fort St.George,
Chennai 600 009.
2.The Commissioner of Police,
Chennai City,
Office of the Commissioner of Police,
Egmore, Chennai-08.
3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Triplicane Range,
Chennai 600 005.
4.The Inspector of Police,
D-2, Anna Salai, Chennai.
+2 ccs to Mr.R.Rajesh Kumar Advocate sr.13593
W.P.No.16778 of 2015
aa09/03/2016

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.Muthupandian @ Muthupandi v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Muthupandian @ Muthupandi v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.P.Velu, Vs the Tahsildar

Dr.R.Gnanasambandam, Vs The Registrar

Dr.R. Gnanasambandam Vs The Principal Secretary

Mrs.S.Saritha Vs The Inspector General

R.P.Murugan, Vs The Inspector General of

G.Ezhilarasi Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer