Challenging the above said resolution, he filed W.P.No.6222 of 2004 before this Court. Based on the interim order granted by this Court, he continued to work as Lecturer, till his date of superannuation i.e. 31.01.2011. By order dated 16.3.2012, this Court allowed the Writ Petition quashing the later part of the resolution No.84.7 dated 27.2.2014 i.e. reverting the petitioner from teaching post to non-teaching post and the appointment of the petitioner as Lecturer in the Department of Mechanical Engineering with effect from 5.7.2001 was confirmed. Pursuant to the order of this Court, he made a representation dated 3.5.2012 and reminders dated 14.8.2012 and 8.10.2012 requesting the respondent to implement the order of this Court and settle all his terminal benefits within a stipulated period. Since the respondent failed to comply with the order of this Court dated 16.3.2012, he preferred Contempt Petition. Thereafter, the respondent sanctioned all his terminal benefits. However, no interest was paid for the belated payment of his terminal benefits. Therefore, he made a representation dated 13.1.2014 requesting the respondent to pay interest for the belated payment of his terminal benefits at the rate of 18% per annum till the actual date of payment. By Letter in Ref.No.51098/PR 12/2001 dated 6.6.2014, which is impugned in the Writ Petition, the respondent has rejected the claim on the ground that there is no specific court order for the payment of interest for the belated payment of terminal benefits. Hence the Writ Petition.
