In a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction not to interfere with petitioner's property, the High Court held that nothing survives since the land was acquired and house demolished. The petition was dismissed.
Petition dismissed as nothing survives after land acquisition and demolition of house.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 09.12.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
Writ Petition No.1567 of 2003
and
WMP.No.1959 of 2003
M.Haridoss ... Petitioner
-Versus-
Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's property at No.22, Radial Road (Old Mahabalipuram Road), Kandanchavadi, Chennai-96 in S.No.39/1, Perungudi Village.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Maninarayanan
For Respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayan Spl.GP ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's property at No.22, Radial Road (Old Mahabalipuram Road), Kandanchavadi, Chennai-96 in S.No.39/1, Perungudi Village.
W.P.No.1567 of 2003 RSY(CO) RMP(09/02/2017)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives after the land was acquired and the house demolished.
Whether a direction not to interfere with possession is feasible when the land has been acquired.
M. Haridoss
The Collector of Kancheepuram District Collectorate
The Deputy Tahsildar (Land Acquisition)
The Divisional Engineer
P.N. Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
