"9. Further, it has to be pointed out that, so far as the award of compensation mentioned in the impugned order, the Distirct Collector in the penultimate para, has made vague observation,stating that the petitioner is entitled to proper compensation. Therefore, to that extent, the order passed by the District Collector is held to be not tenable, as it is inconsistent with regard to the manner in which the compensation has to be determined as per the guidelines framed by the Government of India. Accordingly, while upholding the order passed by the District Collector to the aforesaid extent, there will be a direction to the petitioner to submit his claim statement before the first respondent/District Collector, in accordance with the guidelines framed by the Government of India, dated 15.10.2015, along with a copy of this order, clearly setting out as to what is the basis of his claim and the petitioner is entitled to invoke all the clauses under the guidelines. On receipt of such claim statement, the first respondent shall issue notice to the second respondent, and after affording an opportunity to file their reply/counter, and thereafter, shall issue notice to the petitioner and the second respondent, to produce all documents, including the building valuation report, and after perusing all the documents, hear the parties in full, and pass a reasoned order, by strictly adhering to the guidelines prescribed by the Government of India. The first respondent is directed to give the second rspondent, three weeks' time to file reply/counter, and after receipt of the claim statement from the petitione and after reply/counter affidavit is received from the second respondent, after serving a copy of the same to the petitioner in advance, the first respondent shall fix a date of hearing within a period of 10 days thereafter and after hearing all the parties in full, shall pass appropriate orders within two months from the date on which hearing is concluded."
