Farhan T.Ali v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition filed by T. Farhan Ali under Article 226 of the Constitution was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear before the Single Judge despite multiple listings.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.01.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P. No.14465 of 2003
T.Farhan Ali
[ PETITIONER ]
Vs
1.The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Anna Slai, Chennai 600 002.
2.The Junior Engineer O &M Kilpauk Division, Chennai 600 010.
[RESPONDENTS]
PRAYER : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 28.4.2003, in respect of E.B.Connection No.149-01-550 for Flat No.2C, Uma Complex, Kellys, Chennai 600 010 and to quash the same and further forbear the respondents from initiating any action for recovering the penal charges and compounding fees of Rs.46,074/- from the petitioner on the basis of the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 28.4.2003 in E.B.Connection No.149-01-550, without providing an opportunity to the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T. Farhan Ali
- respondent
The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Anna Slai, Chennai 600 002
- respondent
The Junior Engineer O &M Kilpauk Division, Chennai 600 010
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court