Disposed

E.Barathidasan v. South Indian Bank Ltd.

Madras HC1 Dec 2016WP/14239/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ of mandamus directing the bank to grant an education loan for his daughter's college fees. The court directed the bank to process the application within two weeks and grant the loan if eligible, disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 3rd respondent to process the education loan application within two weeks and grant the loan if the petitioner is entitled.

E.Barathidasan Vs South Indian Bank Ltd. — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01/12/2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶5

W.P.No.14239 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.12440 of 2016

¶6

E.Barathidasan ... Petitioner Vs.

¶7

1. South Indian Bank Limited, Head Office, T.B.Road, Mission Quarters, Thrissur-680 001, Kerala. 2. The Deputy General Manager, South Indian Bank Limited, Regional Office, Niagara Apartments, No.1, Sterling Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34. 3. The Branch Manager, South Indian Bank Limited, No.277, Santhapet, Gudiyatham, Vellore District. 4. Bishop's College of Nursing, C.S.I. Missing Compound, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District rep. by its Administrator 5. The Secretary to Government, Higher Educational Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai-9. ... Respondents (R4 and R5 are suo motu impleaded as per the order dated 11.08.2016)

¶8

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to grant Education Loan to the petitioner's daughter B.H.Bawya herein for the payment of college fees for the Academic Year 2015-2016, 2016-2017, 20172018, 2018-2019.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pandiyaraj For 3rd respondent : Mr.K.N.Chinnakrishnan

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to grant Education Loan to the petitioner's daughter B.H.Bawya herein for the payment of college fees for the Academic Years 2015-2016, 2016-2017, 20172018, 2018-2019.

¶13

Heard both sides.

¶14

The learned Counsel for the 3rd respondent would submit that the 3rd respondent is ready and willing to grant the loan to the petitioner in accordance with law.

¶15

In view of the submission now made by the learned Counsel for the 3rd respondent, the 3rd respondent is directed to process the application of the petitioner seeking education loan within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order and thereafter, to grant Education Loan to the petitioner for the payment of college fees for the Academic Years 2015-2016, 2016-2017, 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 in accordance with law, if he is entitled to.

¶16

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII)

¶18

//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

tsi To 1. South Indian Bank Limited, Head Office, T.B.Road, Mission Quarters, Thrissur-680 001, Kerala. 2. The Deputy General Manager, South Indian Bank Limited, Regional Office, Niagara Apartments, No.1, Sterling Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.

¶20

The Branch Manager, South Indian Bank Limited, No.277, Santhapet, Gudiyatham, Vellore District.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

The Administrator, Bishop's College of Nursing, C.S.I. Missing Compound, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District

¶23

The Secretary to Government, Higher Educational Department, Government of Tamil Nadu,

¶24

Secretariat, Chennai-9.

¶25

- 1 cc to M/s. Chinnakrishnan, Advocate SR.70907

¶26

- 2 ccs to M/s. P. Pandiyaraj, Advocate SR.70904 & 71408 + 1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.71246

¶27

W.P.No.14239 of 2016
MV(CO)
EU 07.12.16

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

E.Barathidasan v. South Indian Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

E.Barathidasan v. South Indian Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Grt Institute of Engineering Vs The All India Council for

Pazhaniammal Vs The District Collector

K.Balasubramaniam Vs v.Ramaiya

V.Lakshmanan Vs The District Collector

M.Babu Narayanan, Vs The District Collector

Chellamuthu Vs The Joint- Commissioner