Disposed

M/s.Teja Enterprises v. The Commissioner of Customs

Madras HC9 Jun 2016WP/13560/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition seeking conditional release of imported furniture goods. Pending the adjudication of a show cause notice regarding value re-assessment, the petitioner is permitted to pay the duty currently assessed. Upon deposit of proposed duty and charges in the show cause notice, the respondents are directed to release the goods within one week subject to the petitioner's

What did the court decide?

Released goods subject to deposit of duty proposed in show cause notice and full cooperation in adjudication within one week.

M/s.Teja Enterprises Vs The Commissioner of Customs — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 09.06.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

W.P.No.13560 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.11880 of 2016

¶6

M/s.TEJA Enterprises Rep by its Proprietrix Mrs.P.Sreedevi No.91, 1^st Main, 4^th Cross New Timber Yard Layout Bangalore .. Petitioner ..Vs..

¶7

1.The Commissioner of Customs (Group 6)
Custom House, No.60, Rajaji Salai
Chennai – 600 001.
2.The Additional Commissioner of Customs (SIIB)
Custom House, No.60, Rajaji Salai
Chennai – 600 001.
3.The Joint Commissioner of Customs (Group 6)
Custom House, No.60, Rajaji Salai
Chennai – 600 001. .. Respondents
Prayer:

¶8

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to release the goods unconditionally viz., 2050 Cartons totally of Furnitures viz., Dining Table, Centre Table, Baby Desk, T.V.Stand, Chair and Dressing Mirror, imported vide Bill of Entry No.9173866, dated 08.05.2015, which was finally assessed by the Proper Officer under the Customs Act and total duty was also paid.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Jayaraj

¶10

For Respondents: Mr.V.Sundareswaran, S.S.C.,

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Heard Mr.A.K.Jayaraj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing on

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

behalf of the respondent and with the consent of either side, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶15

2.The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition seeking for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to release the goods unconditionally viz., 2050 cartons totally of Furnitures viz., Dining Table, Centre Table, Baby Desk, T.V.Stand, Chair and Dressing Mirror, imported vide Bill of Entry No.9173866, dated 08.05.2015, which was finally assessed by the Proper Officer under the Customs Act and total duty was also paid.

¶16

3.After notice was ordered in the writ petition and the matter was heard today in the presence of the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent, it is seen that already a show cause notice had been issued under Section 124 of the Customs Act and the petitioner has received the same. In the said show cause notice, the respondent has proposed to reject the value of the goods as declared in the Bill of Entry and proposed to revalue the goods and re-assess the duty.

¶17

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner, during the course of the argument, on instructions submitted that the petitioner will pay the duty without prejudice to her rights and she may be permitted to raise all issues, including the jurisdiction to issue show cause notice, while submitting the reply. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondent does not oppose such a prayer.

¶18

5.In the light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to raise all the issues in their reply to the show cause notice and it is open to them to pay the duty which has now been assessed by the Department and proceed further in accordance with law. It is made clear that on the petitioner depositing the duty and other charges as proposed in the show cause notice, the respondent is directed to release the goods within a period of one week therefrom, subject to the condition that the petitioner should extend their full cooperation in the adjudication of the show cause notice. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

¶19

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS II)

¶20

//True Copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

¶24

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Teja Enterprises v. The Commissioner of Customs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Teja Enterprises v. The Commissioner of Customs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Asian Bearing Ltd.,New No. Vs Commercial Tax Officer

Mr.a.Shivakumar, Vs The State Transport

M/s.Sri Krishna Electricals Vs The Assistant Commissioner

Miss.Kiruthiga T.M.R Vs Deputy commissioner of

Saranya Ramkumar Vs The Commissioner

A to Z Services Vs The Commissioner