The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the relief sought regarding the legality of the SARFAESI Act had already become obsolete.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.02.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
Writ Petition No.13466 of 2003
D.P.F.Jayaseelan ... Petitioner
vs.
2.UCO Bank, Reliance Buildings, Charring Cross Ootacamud 643 001 Nilgiris District represented by its Authorised Officer. ... Respondents
Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Declaration declaring the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act 2002 as illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.S.Swaminathan
For Respondents : Mr.S.Kothandaraman (R2)
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. rk
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-V)
/True Copy/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To The Secretary to Government, Union of India, Ministry of Law, Sashtri Bhavan, R.P.Road, New Delhi.
W.P.No.13466 of 2003
RSY(CO) sd : 15/02/2016
2 provisions across 2 enactments
D.P.F. Jayaseelan
The Union of India rep. by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Law
UCO Bank
R. Subbiah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
