Petitioner in a writ petition under Article 226 sought EPF and gratuity. The petition was withdrawn by the counsel with the Court's permission, leading to dismissal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.09.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
Writ Petition No.12437 of 2013
A.Venkatachalam ... Petitioner
vs. The Management of the Thiruchengodu Co-operative Urban Bank Limited, Sannathi Street, Thiruchengodu, Namakkal District, PIN:637 211 rep.by its Special Officer ... Respondent
Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of mandamus to direct the respondent herein to pay EPF and gratuity to the petitioner with interest at 12% per annum with cost within a specified period. For Petitioner :Mr.B.Haribabu For Respondent :Mr.L.P.Shanmugha Sundaram, Spl.G.P.(Co-op.) ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the WP. 2. In view of the same, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Special Officer, The Management of the Thiruchengodu Co-operative Urban Bank Limited, Sannathi Street, Thiruchengodu, Namakkal District, PIN:637 211.
+1cc to Mr.B.Haribabu, Advocate Sr.51021
W.P.No.12437 of 2013
sv[co]
srg 04/10/2016
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Venkatachalam
The Management of the Thiruchengodu Co-operative Urban Bank Limited
R.Subbiah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
