Petitioner sought withdrawal of the Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw the Writ Petition; set aside of impugned order via withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.07.2016
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
W.P.No. 10711 of 2015 & M.P.No.1 of 2015
M.Kannan
... Petitioner
Vs.
The Executive Engineer Erode Electricity Distribution Circle Perundurai
Erode District.
... Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in his proceedings ku.Aa.No.042/472/Nep/Nev/Ko.Ta.Pa.Ne 2013-6, dated 01.02.2014 and quash the same and pass such further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Regunathan
For Respondent : Mr.P.R.Dhilip Kumar
The learned counsel for the petitioner had given a letter to the registry, dated 14-07-2016, seeking to list the matter under the caption “For withdrawal”. Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner had sought the permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
The Executive Engineer Erode Electricity Distribution Circle Perundurai
Erode District.
+1 cc to Mr.V.Regunathan Advocate sr.40085
W.P.No. 10711 of 2015
aa22/07/2016
M. Kannan
The Executive Engineer Erode Electricity Distribution Circle Perundurai Erode District
B. Rajendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
