Partly allowed

S.Govindaraj, v. The Tamilnadu State Marketing

Madras HC24 Mar 2016WP/10489/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Four writ petitions filed under Article 226 seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the Tamilnadu State Marketing Corporation to consider representations and reminders regarding payment of arrears of rent due to the petitioners. The court directed the corporation to pass orders on merits within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 1st respondent to consider petitioners' representations and reminders and pass orders on merits within six weeks.

S.Govindaraj, Vs The Tamilnadu State Marketing — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 24.03.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.Nos.10489, 10490, 10245 and 10246 of 2016 S.Govindaraj ... Petitioner in WP.10489/16 S.Ranugadevi ... Petitioner in WP.10490/16 G.Kalaiselvi ... Petitioner in WP.10245/16 M.Shenbakavalli ... Petitioner in WP.10246/16 Vs. 1.The Tamilnadu State Marketing Corporation Limited [TASMAC Ltd], Rep by its Chairman, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2.The South Regional Manager, TASMAC Ltd., LLA Building, Mount Road, Chennai-8. 3.The General Manager R.V, TASMAC Ltd., 4^th Floor, CMDA Tower-II, IV Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai-8. 4.The Deputy General Manager R.V, TASMAC Ltd., 4^th Floor, CMDA Tower-II, IV Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai-8. 5.The Managing Director, TASMAC Ltd., 4^th Floor, CMDA Tower-II, IV Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai-8. 6.The District Manager, Chennai[North], IMFS Depot, TASMAC Ltd., TASCO Unit, B-4 Flats, Industrial Estate, Ambattur, Chennai. .. Respondents in all WPs

¶6

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶7

Prayer in WP.No.10489 of 2016 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1^st respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.03.2013 along with to follow up Reminders I-II & III dated 25.04.2013 and 19.08.2013 02.11.2015 made for the payment of arrears of rent due to the petitioner from the 2^nd respondent in respect shop No.167 Bar, situated No.16, Broadway High Road, Chennai-600 001 and to dispose the same in accordance with law in a prescribed time limit.

¶8

Prayer in WP.No.10490 of 2016 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1^st respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.03.2013 along with to follow up Reminders I-II & III dated 25.04.2013 and 19.08.2013 02.11.2015 made for the payment of arrears of rent due to the petitioner from the 2^nd respondent in respect shop No.131 Bar, situated No.188, Broadway High Road, Chennai-600 001 and to dispose the same in accordance with law in a prescribed time limit.

¶9

Prayer in WP.No.10245 of 2016 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1^st respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.03.2013 along with to follow up Reminders I-II & III dated 25.04.2013 and 19.08.2013 02.11.2015 made for the payment of arrears of rent due to the petitioner from the 2^nd respondent in respect shop No.134 Bar, situated No.72/1, Amman Kovil Street, Sowcarpet, Chennai-2 and to dispose the same in accordance with law in a prescribed time limit.

¶10

Prayer in WP.No.10246 of 2016 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1^st respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.03.2013 along with to follow up Reminders I-II & III dated 25.04.2013 and 19.08.2013 02.11.2015 made for the payment of arrears of rent due to the petitioner from the 2^nd respondent in respect shop No.132 Bar, situated No.34, No.16, Zils Street, Broadway High Road, Chennai1 and to dispose the same in accordance with law in a prescribed time limit.

¶11

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Doraisamy, SC in all WPs for Mr.P.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.B.Nedunchezhian, in all WPs Standing Counsel

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶14

The petitioners have filed the above Writ Petitions to issue Writs of Mandamus directing the 1^st respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 01.03.2013 along with follow up reminders dated 25.04.2013, 19.08.2013 and 02.11.2015 made for the payment of arrears of rent due to the petitioner from the 2^nd respondent in respect of Shop No.167, situated at No.16, Broadway High Road, Chennai-1, Shop No.131 situated at No.188, Broadway High Road, Chennai-1, Shop No.134 situated at No.72/1, Amman Kovil Street, Sowcarpet, Chennai-2 and Shop No.132 situated at No.34, No.16, Zils Street, Broadway High Road, Chennai-1.

¶15

It is the case of the petitioners that in spite of their representations given to the respondent to make the payment of arrears of rent due to the petitioner, the 2^nd respondent has not passed any orders so far.

¶16

Mr.B. Nedunchezhian, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, submitted that the 1^st respondent may be directed to pass orders on the petitioners representation within a stipulated time.

¶17

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner, I direct the 1^st respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 01.03.2013 and the reminders dated 25.04.2013, 19.08.2013 and 02.11.2015 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

With these observations, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

gya Sd/-

/true copy/

1.The Tamilnadu State Marketing Corporation

¶23

Limited [TASMAC Ltd],

¶24

Rep by its Chairman,

¶25

Secretariat, Fort St. George,

¶26

Chennai-9.

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

2.The South Regional Manager, TASMAC Ltd., LLA Building, Mount Road, Chennai-8. 3.The General Manager R.V, TASMAC Ltd., 4^th Floor, CMDA Tower-II, IV Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai-8. 4.The Deputy General Manager R.V, TASMAC Ltd., 4^th Floor, CMDA Tower-II, IV Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai-8. 5.The Managing Director, TASMAC Ltd., 4^th Floor, CMDA Tower-II, IV Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai-8. 6.The District Manager, Chennai[North], IMFS Depot, TASMAC Ltd., TASCO Unit, B-4 Flats, Industrial Estate, Ambattur, Chennai. + 4 CCS TO MR.P.KANNAN, ADVOCATE SR 18924, 18925, 18926, 18927 + 4 CCS TO MR.B.NEDUNCHEZHIYAN, ADVOCATE SR 19145, 19146, 19147, 19148 KR/1/4/16 W.P.Nos.10489, 10490, 10245 and 10246 of 2016

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Govindaraj, v. The Tamilnadu State Marketing

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Govindaraj, v. The Tamilnadu State Marketing

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Pure Chemicals Co. Vs The Commissioner of Commercial

D.Mohamad Ali, Vs The Transport Commissioner

K.James Antonyraj, Vs The Managing Director

M/s.Sri Karunya Hosiery Vs The Assistant Commissioner(Ct)

Tvl.Eswari Agencies Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

S.v.Thiyagarajan, Vs The Government of Tamilnadu