Partly allowed

R.Chitra, v. The District Collector

Madras HC22 Apr 2016WP/10410/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment considers a Writ Petition filed by a petitioner whose husband is an accused in a murder case. The court directed the Superintendent of Police to expedite a representation for police protection under a specific Government Order.

What did the court decide?

The second respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.02.2016 and pass an order in terms of G.O.Ms.No.919 Home Department dated 11.08.2008 within one week.

R.Chitra, Vs The District Collector — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 22.04.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. MALA

¶5

W.P.No.10410 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.9181 of 2016

¶6

R.Chitra .. Petitioner

¶7

.. Vs ..

¶8

1.The District Collector Office of the District Collector Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram.

¶9

2.The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram.

¶10

3.The Inspector of Police Guduvanchery police station Kancheepuram District. .. Respondents

¶11

Prayer:- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to provide police protection to the petitioner and her family including her husband Mr.K.S.Ravi and two children at petitioner cost based on her representation dated 08.02.2016.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sathish Kumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Sanjay Gandhi Additional Government Pleader

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The Writ Petition is filed for issuing a direction to the respondents to provide police protection to the petitioner and her family including her husband Mr.K.S.Ravi and two children at petitioner cost based on her representation dated 08.02.2016.

¶15

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even though the petitioner has given a representation dated 08.02.2016 to the respondents, neither they have taken steps to

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

provide police protection nor they dispose the said representation. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with this petition for the above stated relief.

¶18

3.Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader.

¶19

4.A perusal of the typed set of papers reveals that on the basis of the complaint given by one Sundar, a case in Crime No.1056 of 2015 has been registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 397, 506(ii) IPC and Section 7 read with Section 25(1)(A) of Arms Act, 1959. In the voluntary confession statement, it is stated that the accused persons are planning to commit murder of two VIPs in Guduvancherry area. On enquiry, they came to know that the petitioner's husband is one among them. In that regard, petitioner's husband had already lodged a complaint before the second respondent on 22.01.2016 and now the said persons were also released on bail. Hence, she prays for police protection.

¶20

5.Considering the submissions made on both sides, I am of the view that it is a fit case for giving a direction to the police to provide adequate police protection. Accordingly, the second respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.02.2016 and pass appropriate order on merits and in accordance with law in terms of G.O.Ms.No.919 Home Department dated 11.08.2008, within a week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

6.With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

-s/d-

Assistant Registrar

True Copy

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶26

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

¶29

1.The District Collector Office of the District Collector Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram.

¶30

2.The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram.

¶31

3.The Inspector of Police Guduvanchery police station Kancheepuram District. +1 cc to M/s.M.Sathish Kumar Advocate sr.25560 W.P.No.10410 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.9181 of 2016 aa03/05/2016

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Chitra, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Chitra, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balamani Vs the Commissioner of Police

R.Suresh Kumar Vs the Sub-Divisional Executive

Mr.Kharthik Gounder Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

A.Aruna (Aged 30 Years) Vs The Commissioner of Police

Gandhi Vs State Rep by

R.Eswaran Vs State Rep. by