G.Suresh, v. The District Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
This Writ Petition challenged the suspension and non-posting of a TASMAC employee. The Court directed the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.
What did the court decide?
Directed the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 21.06.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
W.P. No.10399 of 2016
G.Suresh .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Manager, The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., Thirumalasai, SIDCO Campus Unit 1, Thiruvallur East, Thiruvallur Region.
2.The Senior Regional Manager, The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., LLA Building, Mount Road, Chennai – 600 002. .. Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing to consider communication in Na.Ka.No.A2/2834/2015 dated 12.09.2015 sent by the first respondent to second respondent for revoking suspension and thereby directing the respondent to give posting.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Sidharthan
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the competent authority should be directed to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders on his suspension and posting.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G. Suresh
- respondent
The District Manager, The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd.
- respondent
The Senior Regional Manager, The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court