Disposed

M.Jesi, v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC18 Mar 2016WP/10227/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board to allot a house based on a pending representation. The court disposed of the petition without going into merits, directing the respondent to consider the representation after affording a personal hearing within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.03.2016 after an opportunity of personal hearing and dispose of it on merits within twelve weeks.

M.Jesi, Vs The Secretary to Government — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.03.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH

¶5

W.P.No.10227 of 2016

¶6

M.Jesi ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.
1.The Secretary to Government,
Tamil Nadu Housing and
Urban Welfare Department,
Secretariat, Chennai – 09.
2.The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board,
Chennai – 05. ... Respondents

¶8

Prayer:

¶9

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 07.03.2016 within stipulated period by the respondents and consequently direct the second respondent to allot the house to the petitioner at No.371, 12^th block at Kasipuram, 'A' Block, Kasimedu, Chennai – 13, under remuneration slum scheme based on the petitioner house allotment order in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.G2/30201/84-dated 17.06.1998 issued by the second respondent.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.T.V.G.Kartheeban

¶11

For Respondents: Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi for R1

¶12

The Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus for a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.03.2016 within stipulated period by the respondents and consequently direct the second respondent to allot the house to the petitioner at No.371, 12^th block at Kasipuram, 'A' Block, Kasimedu, Chennai – 13, under remuneration slum scheme based on the petitioner house allotment order in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.G2/30201/84-dated 17.06.1998 issued by the second respondent.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

2.It is the case of the petitioner that her husband was allotted the house at door No.410, at Power Kuppam Area Scheme Houses based on Slum Remuneration Scheme vide proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.G2/30201/84, dated 17.06.1998 temporarily. But house was not allotted to the petitioner as per allotment order. In this regard, the petitioner approached the Tamil Nadu Slum Board Chairman and the second respondent herein on several occasions. But, she was informed that after the building extension at Kasipuram 'A' Block, Kasimedu, Chennai – 13 is over, she will be allotted the house premises by the Tamil Nadu Slum Board Chairman. Now, extension building consisting of 379 houses were also constructed at Kasipuram 'A' Block, Kasimedu, Chennai – 13 and 277 houses were allotted to the co-allotters. Hence, the petitioner gave a representation dated 07.03.2016 to the respondents for allotment of vacant house under Slum Remuneration Scheme. Since the said representation is still pending, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition for the above relief.

¶15

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the first respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent, who took notice for the respondents.

¶16

4.Considering the factual aspects of the matter, without going into the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 07.03.2016 and after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and necessary parties, dispose of the said representation, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶17

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶18

//True Copy//

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

pri

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

¶23

1.The Secretary to Government, Tamil Nadu Housing and Urban Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 09.

¶24

2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Chennai – 05.

¶25

+1cc to M/s. T.V.G. Kartheeban, Advocate, S.R.No.17463
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.17689

¶26

ALA(CO)
EU(05/04/2016)
W.P.No.10227 of 2016

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Jesi, v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Jesi, v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. v. Ezhilmaran, Vs The Deputy Inspector General

K.Manjunathan, Vs The Inspector of Police

Shammer S.Shah, Vs The Commissioner

S.Manimekalai, Vs The Tahsildar

K.Satha Sivam Vs The Inspector of Police

S.Anandhi Vs The Secretary to Government