M.Aadhavan, v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought promotion to Record Clerk or Junior Assistant post. Counsel applied to withdraw the writ petition; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.07.2016
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
W.P.No.10065 of 2011
M.Aadhavan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Commissioner, Agricultural Marketing & Agri Business, Thiru.Vi.Ka. Industrial Estate, Sipped Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. 2. The Secretary, Coimbatore Market Committee, No.184, Trichy Road, P.O.No.7104, Ramanathapuram Post, Coimbatore-45. 3. A.Vijayakumar, Junior Assistant, Agri Market Committee, Regulated Market, Sulur. 4. K.Shanthi, Record Clerk, Coimbatore Market Committee, Coimbatore. ... Respondents
Prayer:Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order dated 24.02.2011 and 28.02.2011 in M2/2565/2011 passed by the second respondents and quash the same and directing the first and second respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Record Clerk or Junior Assistant as per the seniority list dated 15.02.2011.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Manickavel For Respondents : Mrs.M.E.Raniselvam, Additional Government Pleader
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Aadhavan
- respondent
The Commissioner, Agricultural Marketing & Agri Business
- respondent
The Secretary, Coimbatore Market Committee
- respondent
A.Vijayakumar
- respondent
K.Shanthi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court