Disposed

M.Sivakumar, v. The Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC18 Mar 2016WP/10053/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge directed the High Court Respondent to receive petitioners' Autorickshaw permit applications dated 16.02.2016 in Form CCPA, consider them on merits with fees, and render a decision within six weeks without expressing opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to receive applications dated 16.02.2016 in Form CCPA with fee, consider them on merits within six weeks.

M.Sivakumar, Vs The Regional Transport Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 18.03.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.Nos.10053 to 10073 of 2016

¶6

M. Sivakumar ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10053 of 2016 S. Dineshkumar ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10054 of 2016 A. Murugan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10055 of 2016 A. Dominic Xavier ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10056 of 2016 Mrs.S.Devi ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10057 of 2016 G. Hemanathan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10058 of 2016 M. Sakthivel ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10059 of 2016 A. Micheal Johnson ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10060 of 2016 G. Mohan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10061 of 2016 A.S. Hidayath Shariff ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10062 of 2016 P. Veerapandiyan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10063 of 2016 S. Saravanan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10064 of 2016 S. Srinivasan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10065 of 2016 A. Ramzan Ali ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10066 of 2016 D. Karthick ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10067 of 2016 P. Thulasiraman ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10068 of 2016 K. Selvam ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10069 of 2016 M. Gunasekaran ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10070 of 2016 N. Udayakumar ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10071 of 2016 K. Dakshinamoorthy ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10072 of 2016 K. Parthasarathi ... Petitioner in W.P.No.10073 of 2016

¶7

¶8

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai-North, Vyasarpadi, Chennai – 600 039

¶9

..Respondent in all the writ petitions

¶10

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writs of Mandamus, directing the respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 16.02.2016 in form CCPA with the prescribed fee for the grant of a Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶11

For Petitioners in all : Mr.B. Kesavan the writ petitions

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.P.V. Selvakumar AGP

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

COMMON ORDER

¶15

The petitioners have filed the above writ petitions to issue writs of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to receive the applications of the petitioners dated 16.02.2016 in form CCPA with the prescribed fee for the grant of a Autorickshaw permit and to consider the same.

¶16

Mr.P.V. Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents and submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the petitioners' applications in accordance with law.

¶17

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the petitioners, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondent to receive the respective applications of the petitioners dated 16.02.2016 in Form CCPA and the prescribed fee for the grant of Autorickshaw permit and consider the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

With this observation, all the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sr To The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai-North, Vyasarpadi, Chennai – 600 039 +21ccs to Mr.B. Kesavan, Advocate, S.R.No.17273 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.17717 AD(CO) EU(23/03/2016)

¶19

W.P.Nos.10053 to 10073 of 2016

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Sivakumar, v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Sivakumar, v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Sathiyamurthy, Vs The Joint Transport

Apm Terminals Private Limited, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Shree Karthik Papers Ltd., Vs the Assistant Commissioner

M/s.Arputharaj & Radhakrishnan Vs The Deputy Commissioner of

R.Sundaramoorthy, Vs The Additional Commissioner of

Moorthy Kothandapani, Vs The Assistant Commissioner of