Disposed
The Central Board of Trustees, v. The presiding Officer
Madras HCWMP/8152/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
8156 of 2016 and WP.Nos.9152 to 9154 of 2016
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WMP.Nos.8152, 8154 and 8156 of 2016 and WP.Nos.9152 to 9154 of 2016
T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.
The question of granting interim order against the impugned proceedings does not arise since the appeal filed by the second respondent has been allowed. Therefore, whatever action the petitioner can take under the Act, is only when they succeed in the writ petitions.
With the above observation,
the miscellaneous petitions are closed
11 – 03 – 2016
ga
T.S.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court