Dr. S.Krishnaswamy, v. Madurai Kamaraj University
Case brief
What is this about?
The Writ Appeal was dismissed because the appellant had already retired voluntarily, causing the cause of action to cease to exist for further adjudication.
The Writ Appeal was dismissed because the appellant had already retired voluntarily, causing the cause of action to cease to exist for further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.06.2016
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
Writ Appeal (MD) No.965 of 2013 & M.P(MD)No.2 of 2013
Dr.S.Krishnaswamy
... Appellant/Writ Petitioner
-Vs-.
1.Madurai Kamaraj University, Represented by its Registrar, Madurai – 625 021.
2.The Vice-Chancellor, Madurai Kamaraj University,
Madurai – 625 021.
3.Dr.T.Anitha Sironmani, Professor, Department of Genetic Engineering, School of Biotechnology, Madurai Kamaraj University,
Madurai – 625 021.
... Respondents/Respondents
Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to allow the writ appeal and set aside the order dated 07.06.2013 passed by the learned Judge in W.P.(MD) No.4422 of 2013 on the file of this Hon'ble Court.
Prayer in WP(MD). 4422/ 2013 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Ref: S.O/SHA/BC/2013 dated 15.03.2013 on the file of the Respondent NO.1 and quash the same as illegal.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondent 1 : Mr.S.Xavier Rajini https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Respondent 2 : No appearance For Respondent 3 : Mr.M.Gnanagurunathan
2
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO,J )
The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner/appellant would submit that the appellant has already sought for voluntary retirement from the service of the respondent University and accordingly, retired also. Therefore, cause in this Writ Appeal does not survive for further adjudication and accordingly, this Writ Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Registrar, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai – 625 021.
2.The Vice-Chancellor,
Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai – 625 021.
SRM
CSL/SKS-RR/13.06.2016 : 2P/3C
Writ Appeal (MD) No.965 of 2013 03.06.2016
Dr.S.Krishnaswamy
Madurai Kamaraj University
Dr.T.Anitha Sironmani
NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO
S.S.SUNDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court