Writ appeal filed against an interim order granting temporary appointment and salary to a teacher. The court disposed of the appeal by consent, directing state authorities to comply with the previous interim order without costs.
Direction to appellants to comply with terms of previous interim order protecting appointment and salary without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.04.2016 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR
and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
W.A.(MD)No.605 of 2016
and
CMP(MD)No.4139 of 2016
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.
3.District Elementary Educational Officer, O/o.The District Elementary Educational Officer,
Tirunelveli 627 001.
4.Assistant Elementary Educational Officer,
O/o.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer,
Palayamkottai Nagar,
Palayamkottai. .. Appellants Vs. 1.Sr.Lillis Mary 2.The Correspondent, Seven Dolours Primary School, Palayamkottai 627 002, Tirunelveli District. .. Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause XV of Letters of Patent, against the common order dated 28.01.2016 made in W.M.P.(MD) No.1525 of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.1763 of 2016.
Prayer in WP(MD). 1763/ 2016 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS calling for the records pertaining to the impugned G.O.Ms.No.181, School Education (C2) Department, dated 15.11.2011 on the file of the 1st respondent and the consequential proceedings dated 02.12.2015 in A.Thi.Mu.No.336/A1/2015 on the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ file of the 4th respondent and quash the same in respect of the petitioner, directing the respondents to approve the appointment of the petitioner Sr. Lillis Mary as Secondary Grade Assistant in
2
Seven Dolours Primary School, Palayamkottai 627 002, Tirunelveli District w.e.f. 04.06.2015.
Prayer in WMP(MD). 1525/ 2016 :
To direct the respondents to pay salary to the petitioner by according temporary approval to the appointment of the petitioner as Secondary Grade Assistant in Seven Dolours Primary. School, Palayamkottai 627 002, Tirunelveli District w.e.f. 04.06.2015, pending disposal of the above WP.
For Appellants : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan Special Government Pleader
For R1 : Mr.S.Xavier Arulraj
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of this Court was delivered by S.MANIKUMAR, J.)
In the present writ appeal, the challenge made is to the order passed by the writ Court, directing the appellants to grant temporary approval for appointment of the first respondent as Secondary Grade Teacher in the second respondent school and to pay salary to her from the date of her appointment, till the date of disposal of the writ petition.
2.Learned counsel appearing for the parties in the appeal, have consented that, they are agreeable that the order passed in W.A.(MD) No.220/2016 dated 05.02.2016, be passed in the present appeal also, details of which are given below. Thus, by consent, the present appeal is taken up and disposed of.
3.On an earlier occasion, a similar Writ Appeal (MD) No.220 of 2016, filed by the State, has been considered and disposed of on 05.02.2016 by a Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, to which, one of us ( SMKJ ) is a party.
4.Mr.S.Xavier Rajini, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent/petitioner has consented for a similar order to be passed.
5.In as much the above learned counsel for the first respondent/writ petitioner has consented for a similar order as made in W.A.(MD) No.220 of 2016, dated 05.02.2016, this Court deem it fit to extract the same and dispose of the Writ Appeal on the same lines:
“4.In a similar writ appeal filed by the State in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the Principal Bench, a Division Bench of this Court has passed the following order in W.A.No.1299 of 2015, dated 14.09.2015.
3
'4.Be that as it may, the issue as to whether the provisions of the Act, will be applicable to a minority institution, is pending consideration in Aswinithanappan Vs. Director of Education and another – (2014) 8 SCC 272.
5.In view of the above, without going into the merits of the case as to whether a teacher appointed in a minority school is required to have TET qualification, as the same is the subject matter of the Writ petition, we are of the considered view that interest justice would subserve, if the appointment of the first respondent is protected, without giving any direction to the State Government to grant temporary approval.
6.Mr.D.Krishnakumar, learned Special Government Pleader (Education) appearing for the appellants fairly submits that the first respondent shall not be terminated during the pendency of the said writ petition being W.P.No.14072 of 2015.
7.Accordingly, we direct that the first respondent shall be given her salary in the course of her employment and no steps to remove her from service shall be taken till the disposal of the writ petition. However, it is made clear that this order is subject to the final outcome of the pending writ petition. It is further made clear that the first respondent shall not claim any equity on account of this order, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, therein.
8.This intra-Court appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. ”
6.By consent, Writ Appeal is disposed of on the same lines as ordered in W.A.(MD) No.220 of 2016 dated 05.02.2016. Having consented, appellants are directed to comply with the orders. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Additional Chief Secretary, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.
4
2.The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.
W.A.(MD)No.605 of 2016
15.04.2016
SH/AAL-MPA:09.05.2016:4P/5C
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Aswinithanappan Vs. Director of Education and anotherReferred¶35
Aswinithanappan Vs. Director of Education and another – (2014) 8 SCC 272 · Who else cites this
Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Additional Chief Secretary, Department of School Education
Director of Elementary Education
District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli
Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Palayamkottai
Sr. Lillis Mary
Correspondent, Seven Dolours Primary School, Palayamkottai
S. Manikumar
S. S. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
