G. Poongavanam v. the Director Incharge
Case brief
What is this about?
The appell an t challenged the transfer from Upper Division Clerk to an equivalent post as a reversion. The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court found full pay and no financial repercussion, dismissing the writ appeal.
What did the court decide?
No costs; the coercive writ petition in the lower court is treated as quashed via dismissal of the appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.10.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU
W.A.(MD).No.302 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.1707 of 2016
G.Poongavanam : Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Director incharge,
The Gandhigram Institute of Rural Health and Family Welfare Trust,
Soundaram Nagar, Gandhigram Post,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a transfer from a post to an equivalent post with full pay protection constitutes a rever sion warranting quashing?
Whether the appellant can challenge the incident of transfer by characterizing it as a reversion?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G. Poongavanam
- respondent
The Director incharge, The Gandhigram Institute of Rural Health and Family Welfare Trust
- respondent
Dr. E. Seethalakshmi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court