A.Jeevanandam v. K.Dhanasekar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ appeals seeking withdrawal were dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Madras. Connected miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 04.03.2016
Coram
The Honourable Ms.Justice R.SUDHAKAR and The Honourable Mr.Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN
W.A.Nos.2180 and 2181 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 of 2012
A.Jeevanandam ..Appellant in both WAs
Vs
1. K.Dhanasekar
2.The District Registrar
Office of the District Registrar
No.17, Rajaji Street,
Chengleput 603 001
3. The Sub Registrar
Office of the Sub Registrar
Cheyyur.
4. The Assistant Director,
Mines,
Kanchipuram,
Kanchipuram District. ..Respondents in both
WAs
Prayer: Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the
Letter Patent against the order dated 11.11.2011 and the
subsequent amendment order dated 16.03.2012 passed in
W.P.Nos.16332 and 16333 of 2011. Writ Petitions filed under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a
direction or order in the nature of writ of Certiorarified
Mandamus, to call for records pertaining to the order dt
31.3.2011 made in Appeal No.2 and 3 of 2011 respectively on
the file of 1st respondent and quash the same and consequently
to direct 2nd respondent to cancel the registration of the
Power of Attorney executed by the 3rd respondent and
registered as the document in D. No. 136 IV and 137 IV
respectively dated dt 8.4.2011;
For Appellant : M/s Paul and Paul
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A. Jeevanandam
- respondent
K. Dhanasekar
- respondent
District Registrar
- respondent
Sub Registrar
- respondent
Assistant Director, Mines
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court