Dismissed

The Director of Survey and v. R. Sakthi ( under suspension)

Madras HC22 Apr 2016WA/1421/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This intracourt appeal by the State challenged a Single Judge order mandating payment of select retirement benefits like provident fund and leave salary to a retired police officer denied full pension due to pending corruption charges. The High Court found no error in the order and dismissed the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Writ appeal stood dismissed; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

The Director of Survey and Vs R. Sakthi (… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 22.04.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI

¶5

and THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

W.A.No.1421 of 2015
and
M.P.No.1 of 2015
1. The Director of Survey and
Land Records,
Chepauk, Chennai - 5.
2. The Assistant Director of Survey
and Land Records,
Collectorate, Dharmapuri. ... Appellants
Vs.
R.Sakthi ... Respondent
Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the
order dated 06.04.2015 made in W.P.No.9882 of 2015.

¶7

W.P.No.9882 of 2015 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to disburse the petitioner's retirement benefits like Provident Fund, Special Provident Fund, Gratuity, Death Cum Retirement Gratuity Benefits (DCRGB) and Leave Salary.

¶8

For Appellants : Ms.A.Srijayanthi, Special Government Pleader For Respondent : Mr.C.Prakasam

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

JUDGMENT

¶11

(delivered by SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, J.)

¶12

With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the writ appeal is taken up for final disposal.

¶13

2.The instant intra-court appeal arises from the order dated 06 April, 2015 made in W.P.No.9882 of 2015.

¶14

3.The writ petitioner, who is the respondent herein, filed the writ petition, seeking a direction to the appellants herein to disburse his retirement benefits, such as provident fund, special provident fund, gratuity, death cum retirement gratuity benefits (DCRG) and leave salary.

¶15

4.The respondent/writ petitioner working as Sub Inspector of Survey in the Taluk Office, Pennagaram, Dharmapuri District, was to retire on attaining the age of superannuation on 31 May 2014. However, he was not permitted to do so on account of pendency of the criminal case under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

¶16

5.The learned Single Judge, considering all aspects of the matter, held that the respondent/writ petitioner was not permitted to retire on attaining the age of superannuation and he could not get pension and Death cum Retirement Gratuity (DCRG), in case of his dismissal from service, however, he is entitled to other benefits such as Special Provident Fund, General Provident Fund and earned leave benefits. While disposing of the writ petition, a direction was issued to the first appellant herein to settle the General Provident Fund, Special Provident Fund and encashment of leave salary, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

¶17

6.We do not find any error, illegality or infirmity in the order sought to be impugned in this writ appeal preferred by the State, warranting interference. Thus, the writ appeal stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶20

//True Copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

mmi

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

¶25

The Director of Survey and Land Records,

¶26

Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

¶27

The Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records,

¶28

Collectorate, Dharmapuri.

¶29

+1cc to Mr.C.Prakasam, Advocate, S.R.No.22483

¶30

W.A.No.1421 of 2015
AD(CO)
CA(09/05/2016)

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Director of Survey and v. R. Sakthi ( under suspension)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Director of Survey and v. R. Sakthi ( under suspension)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Sunciti Apartment Owners Vs Chief Executive Officer &

M.Ahamed Uduman, M.a., Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

M/s.State Bank of India, Vs The District Collector

M/s.Ramaniyam Real Estates Vs The Secretary to Government

Jayalakshmi Vs the Inspector of Police

A.L.S.Vadivel, Vs Corporation of Chennai