Allowed

The President v. P.Chinnamanickam

Madras HC28 Jul 2016WA/1017/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an appeal by a Cooperative Society challenging an order directing payment of subsistence allowance to a suspended officer. Finding no merit and lack of specific grievance, the Court directed respondents to consider the subsistence claim and pay it pending the enquiry.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondents to pass orders on the subsistence allowance representation and pay the same (if unpaid) within two months, continuing payment till enquiry completion.

The President Vs P.Chinnamanickam — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 28.07.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G. RAMESH

¶5

and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN

¶6

The President

¶7

K.K.41 Thumbalahalli Primary Agricultural Co-op. Credit Society, Thumbalahalli, Kettinganahalli Post Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri District. ... Appellant/2nd Respondent

¶8

vs.

¶9

1.P.Chinnamanickam ...1stRespondent/Petitioner

¶10

2.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Dharmapuri Region, Dharmapuri District. ...II Respondent/I Respondent

¶11

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 23.04.2012 made in W.P.No.11208 of 2012 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court.

¶12

WP.No.11208/12:

¶13

Writ Petition praying to writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pass appropriate orders on the representation dt.18.1.2010 made by the Petitioner herein with a stipulated time period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

¶14

JUDGMENT (Order of the Court was made by HULUVADI G. RAMESH,J.)

¶15

This Writ Appeal is arising out of the order, considering the representation of the writ petitioner dated 18.01.2010, seeking subsistence allowance.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this Court.

¶18

From the facts made available herein, it is seen that the writ petitioner was suspended from service on 20.03.2009. However, he was not paid any subsistence allowance during that period. Hence, he submitted representations dated 18.01.2010, 23.01.2012 and 13.03.2012, which were not considered. Therefore, he filed a writ petition in W.P.No.11208 of 2012, which was disposed of, by an order dated 23.04.2012, wherein, the learned Single Judge has directed the respondents therein to consider the representation dated 18.01.2010 within a period of four weeks. As against the same, the present writ appeal came to be filed by the Society.

¶19

A perusal of the order impugned herein would reveal that a direction was issued to the respondents therein i.e., (i)Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Dharmapuri District and (ii) Special Officer of K.K.41, Thumbalahalli Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, Dharmapuri District, to pass appropriate orders on the representation submitted by the writ petitioner, with regard to payment of subsistence allowance during the suspension period, on account of the misconduct alleged to have been committed by the writ petitioner. Therefore, it is for the respondents therein to take a decision on the representation, as per the direction of this Court dated 23.04.2012.

¶20

We do not think that the Appellant has got any grievance as against the order passed by the learned Single Judge, as it is only to consider the representation of the writ petitioner dated 18.01.2010 seeking subsistence allowance and nothing else.

¶21

In such view of the matter, the appeal filed by the Appellant, that too, after four years, does not require any interference by this Court, as no grievance is expressed by the Appellant, except considering the representation of the writ petitioner, seeking subsistence allowance.

¶22

Regarding the enquiry initiated against the writ petitioner, we do not know the stage of the same. Therefore, it is made clear that it is for the respondents in the writ petition to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the writ petitioner seeking subsistence allowance and pay the same, if not already paid, as per law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and continue to pay the subsistence allowance till the completion of the enquiry proceedings.

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

The Writ Appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶25

/true copy/

¶26

¶27

The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Dharmapuri Region, Dharmapuri District.

¶28

+1 cc to Mr.Digvijayapandian, advocate,sr.42847
+1 cc to Govt.Pleader,sr.43259
mg(co)
krd 18/8
W.A.No.1017 of 2014

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The President v. P.Chinnamanickam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The President v. P.Chinnamanickam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Binny Limited Vs the Commissioner of Customs

M/S K.K.P. Spinning Mills (P) Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Ranniammal, Vs District Collector

Minor Govind Ashok Vs The Government of India

The Executive Director Vs Government of India

The Executive Officer Vs S.Muruga Sivaprakasam