The court dismissed a transfer petition seeking to move a case from the Family Judge, Trichy, to the Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai. The court held the petition was not maintainable as the underlying order had been disposed of by an ex-parte order.
The transfer petition was dismissed with no costs; the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 18.11.2016
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
TR.CMP(MD)No.226 of 2016 and C.M.P(MD)No.4538 of 2016
Susila @ Sujitha
... Petitioner/Respondent
vs.
Mani @ S.Subramanian ... Respondent/Petitioner
Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the H.M.O.P.No.61 of 2016 on the file of the learned Family Judge, Trichy and transfer the same to the learned Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jegadeeswaran For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthil kumar
ORDER
The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that H.M.O.P.No.61 of 2016 was disposed of by the ex-parte order dated 15.03.2016. The learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to dispute the above said facts and accordingly, the present transfer miscellaneous petition as on today is not maintainable and the same is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/
Assistant Registrar(AS)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar.
To
The Subordinate Judge, Trichy.
+1CC to M/S.T.Senthil Kumar,Advocate, SR.No. 70324
TR.CMP(MD)No.226 of 2016 18.11.2016
AM/KM/09.12.2016/1P/3C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Susila @ Sujitha
Mani @ S.Subramanian
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
