Disposed

V.Subathra v. N.Rengarajan

Madras HC14 Jun 2016TR CMP/679/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court entertained a petition under Section 24 CPC for the transfer of a long-pending Matrimonial Original Petition from the Sub Court, Tambaram to the Sub Court, Kancheepuram, considering the petitioner's convenience. The Court ordered the transfer and directed the receiving court to dispose of the matter within four months.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of H.M.O.P.No.493 of 2014 from Sub Court, Tambaram to Sub Court, Kancheepuram with a direction to dispose within four months.

V.Subathra Vs N.Rengarajan — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 14.06.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM

¶5

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.679 of 2015

¶6

and

¶7

M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶8

V.Subathra ... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

N.Rengarajan ... Respondent

¶11

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1906, praying to withdraw the H.M.O.P.No.493 of 2014 on the file of Sub Court, Tambaram and transfer the same to any other Court either at Kancheepuram or Madurantakam.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.C.R.Rukmani

¶13

For Respondent : Ms.Sudha Ramalingam

¶14

Petitioner has filed this petition seeking transfer of H.M.O.P.No.493 of 2014 on the file of Sub Court, Tambaram to the file of Sub Court, Kancheepuram.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondent.

¶16

Though the affidavit in support of the transfer petition besides pleading the difficulties of the petitioner/wife in the conduct of proceedings at the Court where the case presently is pending also informs misgivings about the petitioner having been set ex parte, this Court, even while finding such contention unfounded, taking into consideration the convenience of the petitioner/wife, would direct transfer of H.M.O.P.No.493 of 2014 on the file of Sub Court, Tambaram to the file of Sub Court, Kancheepuram. Considering the position that the case is long pending which also has been occasioned by pendency of the matter before the Lok Adalat, this Court directs the Sub Court, Kancheepuram, to dispose of H.M.O.P.No.493 of 2014 as expeditiously as possible, in any event, not later than four months from the date of receipt of this order.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

¶19

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(J)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
gm
To
1. The Judge, Sub Court,
Tambaram.
2. The Judge, Sub Court,
Kancheepuram.
+1cc to Mr.C.R.Rukmani, Advocate, S.R.No.32468
+1cc to Ms.Sudha Ramalingam, Advocate, S.R.No.32708
Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.679 of 2015
SNS(CO)
CA(29/06/2016)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Subathra v. N.Rengarajan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Subathra v. N.Rengarajan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Preetha Vs Neelakumar

Mahalakshmi Vs P.Hemkumar

P.Palani Gounder, Vs a.Sengodan

T. Venkatapathy, Vs S.R. Sridhar

V. Chendroyan, Vs N. Srinivasan

P.Kalaivani Vs Janssi