Partly allowed

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Jaya Ramamurthy

Madras HC8 Feb 2016TCA/396/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeals by the Department were withdrawn by the learned Standing Counsel. The High Court disposed of the cases by dismissing the appeals and the connected civil revision petitions without costs, granting liberty to pursue pending miscellaneous applications before the Tribunal.

What did the court decide?

The Tax Case Appeals and Civil Revision Petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue pending miscellaneous applications before the Tribunal.

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Jaya Ramamurthy — Income Tax | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 08.2.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN

¶7

Tax Case Appeal Nos.396 to 402 and 474 to 476 of 2015 and CMP.Nos.66 to 72 and 137 to 139 of 2016

¶8

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Coimbatore. ... Appellant/Respondent in all TCAs Vs Smt.Jaya Ramamurthy ... Respondent/Appellant in all TCAs R.Subash Chandru ... Respondent/Appellant in TCAs.396 to 402/15

¶9

Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260(A) of Income Tax Act, 1961 against the Order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai dated 22.08.2014 in

¶10

M.P.No.74/Mds/2014 in ITA No.2335/MDS/2013, M.P.No.75/Mds/2014 in ITA No.2336/MDS/2013, M.P.No.76/Mds/2014 in ITA No.2337/MDS/2013, M.P.No.77/Mds/2014 in ITA No.2338/MDS/2013, M.P.No.78/Mds/2014 in ITA No.2339/MDS/2013, M.P.No.79/Mds/2014 in ITA No.2340/MDS/2013, M.P.No.80/Mds/2014 in ITA No.2341/MDS/2013, M.P.No.71/Mds/2014 in ITA No.2325/MDS/2013, M.P.No.72/Mds/2014 in ITA No.2326/MDS/2013, M.P.No.73/Mds/2014 in ITA No.2327/MDS/2013,

¶11

against the Order made in ITA Nos.157/10-11, 158/10-11, 159/1011 and ITA No.160/10-11, dated 26.11.2013, of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) II, Coimbatore and (ITA Nos.151/10-11, 162/10-11, 163/10-11, 164/10-11 and 165/10-11, dated 25.11.2013 and against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle - I, Coimbatore, made in PAN/GIR Nos.ABLPR 158M, dated 31.12.2010 for the Assessment Years 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, and PAN/GIR Nos.AFMPC 8542C, dated 31.03.2005 for the Assessment Years 2005-

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

06, 2006-07 and 2007-08 respectively.

¶14

For Appellant in all the appeals : Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar for Mr.M.Swaminathan

¶15

For Respondent in all the appeals : Mr.N.Devanathan

¶16

COMMON JUDGMENT

¶17

(Judgment was delivered by V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J)

¶18

Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, learned Standing Counsel for the Department, which is on appeal in the above appeals, seeks permission to withdraw all the appeals with liberty to pursue the miscellaneous applications in M.A.Nos.44 to 53 of 2015 filed before the Tribunal. He has also made an endorsement in the bundle today to that effect.

¶19

Hence, the above tax case appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue the miscellaneous applications now pending before the Tribunal. No costs. Consequently, the above CMPs are also dismissed. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar RS To 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) II, Coimbatore. 3.The Deputy Commissioner, Income Tax Central Circle I, Coimbatore. + 1 CC to Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, Advocate SR NO 8587[8/6/16]

¶20

TCA.Nos.396 to 402 & 474 to 476 of 2015 & CMP.Nos. 66 to 72 & 137 to 139 of 2016

¶21

SCD(CO) CA(29/02/2016)

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Jaya Ramamurthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Jaya Ramamurthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. S.L. Lumax Ltd., Vs the Commissioner of Central

M/S Rane Brake Lining Ltd. Vs the Customs Excise and Service

Yes&Yes Hi-Tech Promotersindia Vs the Commissioner of Central

S. Benjahamin Vs the Customs Excise and Service

M/S.J.M.Baxi & Co., Vs the Joint Secretary, Ministry

M/S Rane Madras Ltd. Vs the Deputy