Dismissed

The Commissioner of Income v. P. Vimalan

Madras HC14 Jun 2016TC/852/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Chennai High Court dismissed Tax Case Appeals Nos. 852 to 856 of 2008 filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Salem. The court held that the appeals were withdrawn pursuant to Circular No. 21 of 2015 as the tax implication was less than the specified ceiling limit. The substantial question of law was left open.

What did the court decide?

Appeals dismissed as withdrawn; substantial question of law left open.

The Commissioner of Income Vs P. Vimalan — Income Tax | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 14.06.2016

¶4

C O R A M

¶5

The Honourable Mr.Justice S.Manikumar and

¶6

The Honourable Mr.Justice D.Krishnakumar

¶7

Tax Case Appeal Nos.852 to 856 of 2008

¶8

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Salem

¶9

... Appellant in all TCAs Vs

¶10

P.Vimalan ... Respondent in TCA Nos.852 to 853/08 2. P.Nithilan ... Respondent in TCA Nos.854 & 855/08

¶11

Prayer in TCA No.852/08: Appeal filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai dated 13.10.2006 in ITA No.650/Mds/01 (Assessment Year 1989-90).

¶12

Prayer in TCA No.853/08: Appeal filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai dated 13.10.2006 in ITA No.1171/Mds/01 (Assessment Year 1990-91).

¶13

Prayer in TCA No.854/08: Appeal filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai dated 13.10.2006 in ITA No.1172/Mds/01 (Assessment Year 1991-92).

¶14

Prayer in TCA No.855/08: Appeal filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai dated 13.10.2006 in ITA No.1173/Mds/01 (Assessment Year 1989-90).

¶15

Prayer in TCA No.856/08: Appeal filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai dated 13.10.2006 in ITA No.1174/Mds/01 (Assessment Year 1990-91).

¶16

¶17

For appellant : Mr.J.Narayanasamy in all TCAs Sr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax. For respondents : Mr.N.Quadir Hoseyn in all TCAs

¶18

C O M M O N J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was made by S.Manikumar,J)

¶19

These Appeals have been filed against the orders of the Income Tax

¶20

Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Madras, dated 13.10.2006 for the assessment years 1989-90, 1990-91 and 1991-92 in respect of the 1st appellant and for the assessment years 1989-190 and 1990-91 in respect of the 2nd appellant.

¶21

The substantial question of law raised in the instant appeals is:-

¶22

“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in holding that the reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 1991-92 is not proper?”

¶23

Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax

¶24

submitted that the tax implication in the instant appeals is less than the

¶25

ceiling limit fixed by the Circular bearing No.21 of 2015, dated 10.12.2015. He further submitted that as per the Circular, Tax Case Appeals have been instructed to be withdrawn, subject to the matters covered under the circular.

¶26

¶27

Placing on record the above submissions, while dismissing the Tax

¶28

Case Appeal Nos.852 to 856 of 2008, as withdrawn, substantial question of law

¶29

raised is left open. No costs.

¶30

(S.M.K.,J) (D.K.K.,J) 14.06.2016

¶31

ars.

¶32

Index: yes/No website: Yes/No.

¶33

¶34

S.MANIKUMAR,J a n d D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J ars

¶35

Tax Case Appeal Nos.852 to 856 of 2008

¶36

14.06.2016

The Commissioner of Income v. P. Vimalan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Commissioner of Income v. P. Vimalan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Customs Excise and Service

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs M/S.M.R.M.Plantations Pvt.

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Smt. M.A. Jananilakshmi

Mettupalayam Vivasayigal Vs State Rep. by its Principal

The Asst. Director of Income Vs the Institute of Development

Commissioner of Income Vs M/S.Intex