D. Rani v. S. Jagadeesan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal disposed of based on a compromise memo wherein the appellant agreed to pay ₹6,00,000 by 30.04.2017 to dismiss the suit, or accept the lower courts' judgment for specific performance if payment was not made.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal disposed of based on a compromise; appellant to pay ₹6,00,000 by 30.04.2017 to secure dismissal of the suit.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DURAISWAMY
SA(MD) No.60 of 2011
D.Rani .. Appellant/Appellant/Defendant
Vs.
S.Jagadeesan .. Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff
Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 CPC aginast the Judgment and Decree of the Principal District Judge, Tiruchirappalli,in Appeal Suit No.103/2009 preferred against the Judgment and Decree of the court of the dated 28.01.2010 in Original Suit No.393 of 2004, II Additional Sub Judge, Tiruchirappalli dated 26.06.2008 Tiruchirappalli.
DECREE : This Second Appeal coming on for hearing on this day upon perusing the Grounds of Appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Appellate Court and the Court of First Instance and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.T.V.Sivakumar, Advocate for the Appellant and of
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the second appeal regarding the specific performance of the agreement and sale of property should be allowed or dismissed,
Whether the parties' compromise memo dated 14.12.2016 should be recorded and acted upon by this court.
Whether the appellant is entitled to ₹6,00,000 settlement or specific relief of possession.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
D. Rani
- respondent
S. Jagadeesan
Coram
M. Duraiswamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court