A second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC was dismissed because the appellant's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the appeal with reserve.
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.11.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
SA.No.870 of 2015
and
M.P.No.1 of 2015
1. Arumugam
2. Seerangayee
3. Kandayee ... Appellants/Plaintiff 4 to 6
vs.
1.Jayanthiammal (Deceased)
2. Thiyagarajan
3. Vatsala
4. Kaveriammal
5. Murugesan
6. Lakshmi Ammal
7.Periyasamy
R2 and R3 recorded as LRs of the
deceased R1 vide order of Court
dt.01.09.2015 in Memo USR.No.6349
dt.11.8.2015. ...Respondents/Defendants 1 to 6
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the
judgment and decree dated 17.12.2004 made in A.S.No.11 of 1999
on the file of Additional District Court (Fast track No.2),
Salem, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.11.1998 made
in O.S.No.1020 of 1984 on the file of 1st Additional District
Munsif, Salem.
Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vsi
To
1.The Additional District Court (Fast Track No.2),
Salem.
2.The 1st Additional District Munsif,
Salem.
+1cc to Mr.P.Gopalan, Advocate Sr.69030
+1cc to Mr.D.Shivakumaran, Advocate Sr.69363
Second Appeal No.870 of 2015
sr[co]
srg 26/12/2016
Arumugam
Seerangayee
Jayanthiammal
Thiyagarajan
K. Ravichandrababu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
