K.Sengodan v. Pavayee
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal court dismissed the appeal on withdrawal. Appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw the Second Appeal filed against Subordinate Judge's judgment. Court allowed withdrawal by dismissing the appeal and closed connected miscellaneous petition.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 04.10.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
Second Appeal No. 227 of 2012
and M.P.No.1 of 2012
K.Sengodan ... Appellant
Vs.
1.Pavayee
W/o Ramasamy
2. R.Muthusamy
S/o Ramasamy
3. Sivakumari,
W/o R.Ganesan
4. Muthayee @ Pappathi
W/o Sidhaiyan
5. S.Vijayakumar,
S/o Sidhaiyan
6.S.Ponmozhi @ Balu,
S/o Sidhaiyan ... Respondents
Second Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 12.10.2011 made in A.S.No.83 of 2009 on the file of I Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem, confirming the Judgment and decree dated 14.10.2006 made in O.S.No.1205 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Salem.
For Appellant : Mr.B.Gopalakrishnan for R.Nalliyappan For Respondents : Mr.R.Neelakandan for R1 & R2 Mr.B.Vijayakumar for R4 to R6 R3- not ready in notice.
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the Appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
- In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Sengodan
- respondent
Pavayee
- respondent
R.Muthusamy
- respondent
Sivakumari
- respondent
Muthayee
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court