Second Appeal dismissed for default as the appellant sought time due to lack of interest in prosecuting the matter further.
Second Appeal dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.11.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN
S.A.No. 1112 of 1995
Krishnamurthy ... Appellant Vs. 1.Sitthi Ameena Ammal 2.Mohamed Zakriya Maraicayar 3.Omar Hathab Maricayar 4.Sabiya Ammal 5.Aysha Beevi Ammal ... Respondents
Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment of the Learned District Judge of East Thanjavur at Nagapattinam passed in A.S.No.149 of 1991 dated 03.09.1992 confirming the decree and judgment of the Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam passed in IA.No.543/85 in O.S.No.3 of 1981 dated 12.02.1991.
For Appellant : M.N.Pandian For R1 : Ms.R.T.Shyamala R2 : Died For RR3 to 5 : No appearance
ORDER
This Second Appeal arises out of the decree and judgment dated 03.09.1992 passed in A.S.No.149 of 1991 by the Learned District Judge of East Thanjavur at Nagapattinam. This appeal is of the year 1995.
Sd/Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rm
To
1. The Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam.
2. The District Judge, Nagapattinam.
+1cc to M/s R.P.Shyamala, Advocate, S.R.No.67301
MV(CO)
BB(30/12/2016)
S.A.No. 1112 of 1995
Krishnamurthy
Sitthi Ameena Ammal
Mohamed Zakriya Maraicayar
Omar Hathab Maricayar
Sabiya Ammal
Aysha Beevi Ammal
G. Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
