C.Rajamani v. C.Rathnabai
Case brief
What is this about?
In this original side appeal, the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. The appeal was filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of O.S.Rules and Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act.
What did the court decide?
None. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 01.11.2016
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice A.SELVAM and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.KALAIYARASAN O.S.A.No.107 of 2010 C.Rajamani .. Appellant/Petitioner vs. C.Rathnabai .. Respondent/Respondent This Appeal is preferred under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of O.S.Rules r/w Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act against the order of this Court dated 21.10.2009 in O.M.S.No.50 of 1998.
Petition filed under section 18 and 22 of the Indian Divorce Act 1869 and order XXVII of Original Side Rules prays for a declaration of the marriage solemnized on 22/1/1981 and Roman Catholic Church, Thalayavattai, kanyakumari District as null and void on the ground the same is vitiated by fraud or in the alternative for judicial separation on the grounds of desertion coupled with cruelty and for other relief.
For Appellant : Mr.A.R.Nixon JUDGMENT (JUDGMENT OF THE COURT WAS DELIVERED BY A.SELVAM, J.)
As per endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, this Original Side Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sub-Assistant Registrar
ajr
Parties & counsel
- appellant
C.Rajamani
- respondent
C.Rathnabai
Coram
A.SELVAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court