This is a one-line procedural order directing the office to record ex-parte evidence after dismissing the suit against certain defendants by order dated 22.08.2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN
C. V . K A R T H I K E Y A N , J.
There is an order of the Master, dated 22.08.2011 that except for the
defendants 3, 8, 11, 14, 15, 16 & 17, all other defendants have been served and the service has been completed.
2. Office has also put up the necessary summons in the Court bundle.
According to which, D2 and D4 were served on 09.10.2010, D5, D6 & D7 were served on 21.10.2010, D9 was served on 11.10.2010, D10 & D12 were served on 12.10.2010 and D13, D18, D19, D20 & D21 were served on 30.09.2010.
3. There has been vakalat filed on behalf of the first defendant alone.
However, written statement has not been filed on behalf of the first defendant.
The learned Master has also dismissed the suit as against the defendants 3, 8,
11, 14, 15, 16 & 17 by the very same order dated 22.08.2011. The other defendants are set ex-parte.
4. Office is directed to post this matter before the learned Additional Master No.II for recording ex-parte evidence. For appearance of the witness representing the plaintiff by 17.11.2016.
02.11.2016
vsg
2
C. V . K A R T H I K E Y A N , J.
vsg
O. A . N o . 88 7 of 20 1 0 IN C. S . N o . 71 3 of 20 1 0
02. 1 1 . 2 0 1 6
C. V. Karthikeyan, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
