The petitioner in a habeas corpus petition moved for the production of his detainee. He withdrew the petition orally stating she was already produced before a magistrate. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.7.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
H.C.P.No.990 of 2016
Annamalai
..... Petitioner
Vs
State by
..... Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS directing the 2nd respondent police viz., the Inspector of Police, Katchirayapalayam Police Station, Villupuram District to trace out the detenu viz., Kamsala, daughter of Annamalai aged about 16 years of Mattapattu Kattukottai, Chinna Salem Taluk, Villupuram District and produce her before this Court, set her at liberty.
2 For Petitioner : Mr.A.G.Rajan For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.NAGAMUTHU, J.)
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the petition as the detenue was already secured and produced before the Judicial Magistrate, Sankarapuram and handed over to the custody of the petitioner. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
kua
(S.N.J.,) (V.B.D.J.,) 14.7.2016
3
To
4
S.NAGAMUTHU J., AND V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.
kua
H.C.P.No.990 of 2016
14.7.2016
Annamalai
State
S. Nagamuthu
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
