Disposed

M.Delhi Babu, Aged 27 Years v. Inspector of Police

Madras HC15 Dec 2016HCP/2592/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Habeas Corpus petition, the petitioner sought production and liberty of his fiancee, Yasmin Banu, detained by her maternal uncle. The court permitted the 25-year-old detenue to accompany the petitioner upon her expression of willingness, directing the police to provide protection against family harm. The petition stands closed.

What did the court decide?

The detenue is permitted to go along with the petitioner. The police are directed to provide protection if requested. The Habeas Corpus petition stands closed.

M.Delhi Babu, Aged 27 Years Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 15.12.2016

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN

¶5

H.C.P.No.2592 of 2016

¶6

M.Delhi Babu .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Inspector of Police, Bagayam Police Station, Vellore District. 2.Aslam. .. Respondents

¶7

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, to produce the fiancée Yasmin Banu, daughter of Ubayathulla, aged about 25 years, before this court and to set her at liberty.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Arunkumar For Respondents: Mr.V.M.R.Rajentran, APP for R-1

¶9

ORDER [Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN,J]

¶10

Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the first respondent.

¶11

2 This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a direction to the first respondent to produce the detenue, namely, Yasmin Banu, daughter of Ubayathulla, aged about 25 years, before this Court and to set her at liberty.

¶12

3 The petitioner has stated that the detenue is his fiancee and that, she has been illegally detained by the second respondent, who is the maternal uncle of the detenue, against her will.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

4 When the detenue had been produced before this Court, by the first respondent police, on 14.12.2016, the detenue had stated that she would like to go along with the petitioner. However, as the petitioner was not present in Court, the detenue had been sent to the Government Women's Home, Kutcheri Road, Mylapore, Chennai, with her consent, to be produced before this Court, today.

¶15

5 Today, when the matter has come up for further hearing, the detenue had clearly stated that she would like to go along with the petitioner. The detenue had also stated that she has been confined in her house, by her family members, against her wishes.

¶16

6 In such circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that since the detenue is aged about 25 years, it is appropriate to permit the detenue to go along with the petitioner, as per her wish. Accordingly, the detenue, Yasmin Banu, is permitted to go along with the petitioner, as per her wish. Since the detenue had expressed the apprehension that she may be harmed by the members of her family, the first respondent police is directed to give her and the petitioner sufficient police protection, if such a request is made by them. No further orders are necessary in the Habeas Corpus Petition. Accordingly, the Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vvk To 1.The Inspector of Police, Bagayam Police Station, Vellore District.] 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. +1cc to Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.73328 KGK(CO) RS(18/01/2017)

¶18

H.C.P.No.2592 of 2016

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Delhi Babu, Aged 27 Years v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Delhi Babu, Aged 27 Years v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Rajeswari, Vs the Secretary to the Govt.

M.Manimegalai Vs the Secretary to Government

Peachiammal Vs the Secretary to Government

Mr.Samuvel Jayaraj, Aged 63YRS Vs the Superintendent of Police

Suresh, Aged 33 Years Vs the Superintendent of Police

R.Ramana Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu