Under Article 226, R.Uma filed a habeas corpus petition for the release of her detained husband. The petition was dismissed as she failed to appear or submit representations from the listed dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.12.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN
H.C.P.No.1279 of 2016
R.Uma .. Petitioner/Wife of the detenue Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, rep by its Secretary to Government, Home Prohibition & Excise Department, Chennai – 600 009 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District-606 601. . Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent, in proceeding No.D.O.No.19/2016/C2, dated 31.5.2016 and to set aside the same and to produce the detenu Ramanan @ Ramanakannan, aged about 50 years, son of Purusothaman, now detained in the Central Prison, Vellore, before this Court and to set him at liberty.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren, Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J.]
This petition has been listed under the caption "For Dismissal", since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, on an earlier occasion, i.e., on 16.12.2016. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vvk
To
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Uma
State of Tamil Nadu
M. Jaichandren
T. Mathivanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
