Disposed

Beer Mohamed Masthar Sahip v. S.M.K.Abdul Muthalif

Madras HC28 Jun 2016CRP(MD)/1302/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This revision under Article 227 sought a direction to the Principal District Court in Dindigul to dispose of an inter-application seeking cross-examination permission within a specified timeframe to prevent prejudice. The court directed disposal preferably by 15.08.2016 and disposed of the revision accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Direction to dispose of I.A.No.34 of 2014 preferably on or before 15.08.2016; disposal of revision without costs.

Beer Mohamed Masthar Sahip Vs S.M.K.Abdul… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED 28.06.2016

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶6

C.R.P(MD)No.1302 of 2016

¶7

Beer Mohamed Masthar Sahip, Dharha Kanthuri Dharma Trust, Through its Trustees,

¶8

1.NPM.Mohammed Ibrahim

¶9

2.NPM.Beer Mohammed .. Petitioners/Respondents/Petitioners

¶10

vs.

¶11

S.M.K.Abdul Muthalif .. Respondent/Petitioner/Respondent

¶12

Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to expedite the proceedings in I.A.No.34 of 2014 in Trust O.P.No.160 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Court, Dindigul.

¶13

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Vijayakumar

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This revision is filed seeking for a direction to the Principal District Court, Dindigul to dispose of the application in I.A.No.34 of 2014 in Trust O.P.No.160 of 2009, within a time frame.

¶16

Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners filed Trust O.P.No.160 of 2009 seeking permission to alienate the properties of the trust, in which the respondent filed I.A.No.34 of 2014 seeking permission of the Court to cross-examine the witness. It is further submitted that though the petitioners filed their counter on 16.06.2016, the petition is being adjourned without any progress, which causes prejudice to the petitioner.

¶17

Considering the above submissions, this Court directs the learned Principal District Judge, Dindigul to dispose of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ application in I.A.No.34 of 2014 in Trust O.P.No.160 of 2009 as expeditiously as possible preferably on or before 15.08.2016.

¶18

¶19

With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

/True Copy/

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

The Principal District Judge, Dindigul.

¶26

+1cc to Mr.R.VIJAYAKUMAR, Advocate Sr.No.33643 PS AA/AAL-MPA/06.07.2016/2p-3c

¶27

C.R.P(MD)No.1302 of 2016 28.06.2016

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Beer Mohamed Masthar Sahip v. S.M.K.Abdul Muthalif

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Beer Mohamed Masthar Sahip v. S.M.K.Abdul Muthalif

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sa.Veeriah Vs Sangu Pillai

B. Gayathri Vs M. Padhmchant

K.Pandian Vs D.Janaki Ammal

The Managing Director, Vs Govindaraj

V. Arul Justin Dhas Vs Tata-Aig General Insurance

Nageswari @ Asha Vs Kamesh Kumar