Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Jayaraman Chettiar Vs Haridoss — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2016)

Home
Madras HC
2016
Jayaraman Chettiar Vs HaridossJayaraman Chettiar v. Haridoss

Dismissed

Jayaraman Chettiar v. Haridoss

Madras HC27 Jan 2016CRP/789/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as not pressed, noting that the underlying matter was compromised in the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :27.01.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM

C.R.P.(N.P.D.).No.789 OF 2013

1.Jayaraman Chettiar 2.Parvathi Ammal 3.Srinivasan

Vs

Haridoss

Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the order passed by the Sub Court, Kallakurichi, made in I.A.No.137 of 2012 in O..S.No.84 of 2006 dated 25.04.2012.

For Petitioners : Mr.P.Valliappan For Respondent : Mr.P.T.Asha for M/s.Sarvabhauman Assoc.

O R D E R

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Jayaraman Chettiar
petitioner
Parvathi Ammal
petitioner
Srinivasan
respondent
Haridoss

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 27 Jan 2016 · January
Registered: 25 Feb 2013
Case no.: CRP/789/2013

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from G. Chockalingam

S.Palani, Vs S.Bharathidasan & 3 Others
12 Jan 2016
D.Dakshinamoorthy & Another Vs Smt.Ranjitham & 4 Others
11 Jan 2016
N.K.Surana Vs Ramu
5 Jan 2016
S.Vairavasamy Nadar (Deceased) Vs G.Venktesan
27 Jan 2016

Cite this judgement

Jayaraman Chettiar v. Haridoss, CRP/789/2013 (MAD), decided on 27 January 2016.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

G. Chockalingam

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

N.P.D. Civil Revision Petition dismissed as not pressed. The matter underlying the petition had been compromised between the parties in the trial court based on counsel's submission.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

The learned counsel for the third petitioner has filed a memo, stating that the Civil Revision Petition was preferred against the I.a.No.137 of 2012 in O.S.No.84 of 2006 on the file of the Sub Court, Kallakurichi, which is still pending before this Court. In the mean while

2

G.CHOCHALINGAM,J.,

kkd

the matter was compromised between the parties in trial court. Hence this Civil Revision Petition may be dismissed as not pressed.

In view of the memo filed by the learned counsel for the third petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

27.01.2016

kkd

C.R.P.(N.P.D.).No.789 OF 2013

G. Chockalingam

CNR

HCMA011212832013

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

G. Chockalingam

Disposal

DISMISSED FOR NOT PRESSED

Madubala @ Suganthi Vs Jeevarathinammal

9 Feb 2016

N. Renukadevi Vs E.Lalitha and Another

4 Mar 2016