Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Kannammal Vs S.Rajasekaran — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2016)

Home
Madras HC
2016
Kannammal Vs S.RajasekaranKannammal v. S.Rajasekaran

Dismissed

Kannammal v. S.Rajasekaran

Madras HC11 Apr 2016CRP/45/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner submitted that the underlying matter had been settled out of court.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.04.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR

CRP No. 45 of 2010 and M.P. No.1 of 2010

Kannammal .. Petitioner

Vs

S. Rajasekaran

Sakthivel

Nehru .. Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 14.12.2009 in E.A. No. 193 of 2009 in E.P. No. 14 of 2007 in O.S. No. 119/2004 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Erode.

For Petitioner : Mr. V. Lakshminarayanan For Respondents : No appearance

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Kannammal
respondent
S. Rajasekaran
respondent
Sakthivel
respondent
Nehru

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 11 Apr 2016 · April
Registered: 6 Jan 2010
Case no.: CRP/45/2010

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from D. Krishnakumar

The Special Secretary, Vs C.Masilamani
15 Mar 2016
B.S.Chandrasekar Vs M/S Sundaram Finance Limited
11 Apr 2016
Karupuranathar Swamy Vs Bharat Sanchar
11 Apr 2016
R.Ravindran Vs v.Revathi
12 Apr 2016

Cite this judgement

Kannammal v. S.Rajasekaran, CRP/45/2010 (MAD), decided on 11 April 2016.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

D. KRISHNAKUMAR

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Civil Revision Petition U/A Art. 115 CPC dismissed as infructuous due to extra-judicial settlement of the underlying dispute. Connected Miscellaneous Petition closed. No costs.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has been settled out of court and therefore the Civil Revision Petition has now become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

Recording the above said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

avr

Assistant Registrar(CS-VII)

True Copy

Sub-Assistant Registrar

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Principal District Munsif, Erode.

1 cc to M/s.V.Raghavachari, Advocate SR 22664 ctk(co) prk28/4 CRP No. 45 of 2010 and M.P. No.1 of 2010

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D. KRISHNAKUMAR

CNR

HCMA011075832010

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

D. Krishnakumar

Disposal

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED